Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SPG-613: use percona-pgbackrest image #1098

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

K8SPG-613: use percona-pgbackrest image #1098

merged 14 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

pooknull
Copy link
Contributor

@pooknull pooknull commented Mar 21, 2025

K8SPG-613 Powered by Pull Request Badge

https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-613

DESCRIPTION

This PR makes it possible to use the image from this PR: percona/percona-docker#1149 as a pgbackrest image.

This PR also adds a new field .spec.initImage to the ./deploy/cr.yaml

CHECKLIST

Jira

  • Is the Jira ticket created and referenced properly?
  • Does the Jira ticket have the proper statuses for documentation (Needs Doc) and QA (Needs QA)?
  • Does the Jira ticket link to the proper milestone (Fix Version field)?

Tests

  • Is an E2E test/test case added for the new feature/change?
  • Are unit tests added where appropriate?

Config/Logging/Testability

  • Are all needed new/changed options added to default YAML files?
  • Are all needed new/changed options added to the Helm Chart?
  • Did we add proper logging messages for operator actions?
  • Did we ensure compatibility with the previous version or cluster upgrade process?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported PG version?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported Kubernetes version?

@pooknull pooknull marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2025 10:38
@@ -8400,6 +8400,9 @@ spec:
type: object
x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic
type: array
initImage:
description: K8SPG-613
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please fix description

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@egegunes egegunes added this to the 2.7.0 milestone Mar 31, 2025
@hors hors self-requested a review April 2, 2025 10:37
@JNKPercona
Copy link
Collaborator

Test name Status
custom-extensions passed
custom-tls passed
demand-backup passed
finalizers passed
init-deploy passed
monitoring passed
monitoring-pmm3 passed
one-pod passed
operator-self-healing passed
pitr passed
scaling passed
scheduled-backup passed
self-healing passed
sidecars passed
start-from-backup passed
tablespaces passed
telemetry-transfer passed
upgrade-consistency passed
upgrade-minor passed
users passed
We run 20 out of 20

commit: a75a3b9
image: perconalab/percona-postgresql-operator:PR-1098-a75a3b9b6

@hors hors merged commit 2d3207f into main Apr 2, 2025
18 checks passed
@hors hors deleted the dev/K8SPG-613 branch April 2, 2025 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants