Fix wording to reflect poor performance of initial query before optimization #20840
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
contribution
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @aquarapid, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses an inaccuracy in the explain-walkthrough.md documentation file. The original wording implied that the initial query performance was ideal, which is not the case. The change corrects this statement to reflect the actual performance and sets the stage for the subsequent optimization steps described in the walkthrough.
Highlights
- Documentation Improvement: The primary change involves correcting a statement in the
explain-walkthrough.mdfile to accurately reflect the initial query performance as 'not ideal'. - Clarity and Accuracy: The update ensures that the documentation aligns with the intended purpose of demonstrating performance optimization techniques.
Changelog
- explain-walkthrough.md
- Changed the phrase 'which is an ideal performance' to 'which is not ideal performance' to accurately describe the initial query execution time.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @aquarapid. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
missing-translation-status
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request modifies a sentence in the explain-walkthrough.md file to accurately reflect the initial performance of a query before optimization. The change is straightforward and improves the clarity of the documentation.
Summary of Findings
- Wording Accuracy: The original wording implied ideal performance, which is incorrect. The updated wording clarifies that the initial performance is not ideal, setting the stage for the subsequent optimization steps.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is ready to be merged. The change is small but significant in improving the accuracy and clarity of the documentation. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
|
@time-and-fate: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Fix wording in the explain walkthrough, the current working seems to imply that the initial performance is good (which it is not). The rest of the walkthrough is to improve the performance, so the changed wording seems more correct.
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
see diff
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?