Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Run Playwright scripts #561

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: Run Playwright scripts #561

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

lonerapier
Copy link
Collaborator

@lonerapier lonerapier commented Mar 11, 2025

No description provided.

@lonerapier lonerapier changed the title init playwright feat: executor Mar 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mattes mattes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice work! excited to see this come together.

I left a few thoughts and comments. already iterating slightly on top of the go mvp work.

@mattes mattes changed the title feat: executor feat: Run Playwright scripts Mar 11, 2025
@mattes
Copy link
Contributor

mattes commented Mar 11, 2025

Maybe executor is too generic for this crate. Can we be more specific? playwright-executor ?

@lonerapier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Maybe executor is too generic for this crate. Can we be more specific? playwright-executor ?

Agreed. what about playwright-executor inside executor crate? or you think it should be part of notary only?

My reasoning was this flow can work independent of notary, and can be exetendned further with a separate crate. For example: using chromiumoxide headless runner instead of playwright

@mattes
Copy link
Contributor

mattes commented Mar 12, 2025

Agreed, it can be used independently. Maybe we start a new utils directory?

utils/playwright-executor ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants