Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage action should not run on macos #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Coverage action should not run on macos #6

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

joshklop
Copy link
Collaborator

@joshklop joshklop commented Apr 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows: Renamed a job for clarity, adjusted execution settings, and added a separate job for test coverage reports.
    • Updated Makefile: Added a new target for running test coverage checks.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@joshklop has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aeb9fdb and c790b3a.

Walkthrough

The recent modifications streamline our GitHub workflow by refining job definitions and platform usage. A job previously focused on coverage is now simplified, with Mac environments explicitly omitted for tests. Additionally, a dedicated job on Ubuntu now exclusively handles the generation of test coverage reports, optimizing our CI process for efficiency and clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Renamed job to "simple", excluded Mac from test runs, added separate coverage job on Ubuntu
.github/workflows/lint.yml Updated workflow to remove tag filtering, adjusted setup for golangci job
Makefile Added .PHONY target check-cover for running test coverage checks with go-test-coverage

🐰✨
In the land of code and sun,
Changes swift, the deed is done.
Tests on Mac now wave goodbye,
Ubuntu stands, its flag held high.
As the rabbit hops away,
Code grows stronger every day.
🌟📜

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@joshklop joshklop force-pushed the ci-fix branch 2 times, most recently from 0e3d237 to e6e099a Compare April 8, 2024 19:33
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aeb9fdb and e259387.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

25-40: The addition of the coverage job running on ubuntu-latest aligns well with the PR objectives to optimize coverage reporting. Good job on centralizing the coverage actions.

@joshklop joshklop force-pushed the ci-fix branch 2 times, most recently from c4ef594 to 3716e6b Compare April 8, 2024 19:36
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aeb9fdb and 5942d88.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

21-23: Consider enabling caching for improved CI performance.

The comments added suggest disabling caching due to a specific issue. However, caching can significantly improve CI performance by reducing download times. If the issue mentioned has been resolved or can be worked around, consider enabling caching.

Makefile (1)

25-26: Ensure .testcoverage.yml configuration aligns with project standards.

The addition of the check-cover target introduces a dependency on a .testcoverage.yml configuration file. Verify that this configuration aligns with the project's standards and testing requirements. Consider adding documentation or comments explaining the expected structure and contents of this configuration file for maintainability.

@joshklop joshklop merged commit d394fea into main Apr 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@joshklop joshklop deleted the ci-fix branch April 8, 2024 20:03
For example: the coverage action doesn't work on macos, we don't have a
self-hosted-arm64 instance, and others.

Also, refactor some names so the UI looks nicer.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant