-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coverage action should not run on macos #6
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@joshklop has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent modifications streamline our GitHub workflow by refining job definitions and platform usage. A job previously focused on coverage is now simplified, with Mac environments explicitly omitted for tests. Additionally, a dedicated job on Ubuntu now exclusively handles the generation of test coverage reports, optimizing our CI process for efficiency and clarity. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
0e3d237
to
e6e099a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
25-40
: The addition of thecoverage
job running onubuntu-latest
aligns well with the PR objectives to optimize coverage reporting. Good job on centralizing the coverage actions.
c4ef594
to
3716e6b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/test.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
21-23
: Consider enabling caching for improved CI performance.The comments added suggest disabling caching due to a specific issue. However, caching can significantly improve CI performance by reducing download times. If the issue mentioned has been resolved or can be worked around, consider enabling caching.
Makefile (1)
25-26
: Ensure.testcoverage.yml
configuration aligns with project standards.The addition of the
check-cover
target introduces a dependency on a.testcoverage.yml
configuration file. Verify that this configuration aligns with the project's standards and testing requirements. Consider adding documentation or comments explaining the expected structure and contents of this configuration file for maintainability.
For example: the coverage action doesn't work on macos, we don't have a self-hosted-arm64 instance, and others. Also, refactor some names so the UI looks nicer.
Summary by CodeRabbit