-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mapping tester reference results #212
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a great step for more robust testing. Currently, tests are failing.
import argparse | ||
from sys import exit | ||
|
||
import polars as pl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There seems to be a problem with polars being called via ctest
: in my venv it works locally (using run.sh
), but ctest
fails for me in the same bash session.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A problem is that we currently overwrite the PATH at configuration time. So any further modifications are not picked up.
I just saw that CMake 3.22 (our new baseline) provide ENV modification support for exact this use-case. https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.22/prop_test/ENVIRONMENT_MODIFICATION.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am wondering why it worked or works for the precice-profiling script (also used in the mapping tester), whereas it fails for the compare script. The precice-profiliing script is called through the gathering script os.subprocess
, maybe that's the simple answer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my venv, the tests pass now. The CI doesn't seem to be happy
https://github.com/precice/aste/actions/runs/11552451140/job/32151545870?pr=212#step:10:447
I am not sure if the actual solution here would be more simple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+ python3 /Users/runner/work/aste/aste/examples/mapping_tester/../../tools/mapping-tester//compare.py reference-statistics.csv test-statistics.csv
The test results differ in both files
DataFrames are different (value mismatch for column 'median(abs)')
[left]: [0.00565710724966223, 0.0004046891096261551]
[right]: [0.00567422622697189, 0.00040468910964214233]
Isn't this a property from the mapping accuracy that should be unchanged?
The polars comparision uses rtol of 1e-05 and an atol of 1e-08.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ASTE generates, exports, partitions to VTU with binary data and uses the VTK-internal calculator.
The only moving targets are the VTK version and the numpy version, which we use to calculate the percentiles/median.
Maybe they changed the interpolation method? Still uses linear interpolation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The assert checks col by col and the first column is the median. So it is possible that other columns don't match too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have the complete result table for both runs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could it be a matter of the column order or something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After a morning of debugging we realised that the partitioning wasn't deterministic, which lead to major differences in NP and even tiny run to run differences in RBF TPS.
We never faced this issue before as we are now using separate cases, compared to
separate runs. Using topology-based partitioning solves the issue and leads to reproducible cases.
ac9c3ca
to
91f154d
Compare
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
jinja2 | |||
numpy | |||
polars |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would require a documentation update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is primarily to get the CI working. I'll revert later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it will remain a requirement to execute the tests, right? In the past, we also had tests for the mapping-tester here, which has optional dependencies. Then, however, users install the software, run ctest
and see that tests are failing.
How does this behave here then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently, the mapping-tester
-test needs precice-profiling analyze
which requires polars
anyway. So the dependency is already there.
If we merge #210, then the timings and thus the dependency on polars becomes optional.
In that case, it may be an idea to implement the compare without polars.
On the flip side, this then becomes a bad test, as it tests two different things depending on the environment. Maybe a warning in CMake is enough here.
Main changes of this PR
This PR adds a mapping tester compare script and reference results.
The script checks:
Closes #208
Author's checklist
pre-commit
hook and usedpre-commit run --all
to apply all available hooks.docs/README.md
../changelog-entries/
(create if necessary).precice/tutorials/aste-turbine
.