Remove hosting providers #254
Conversation
|
The ran before I made my second commit :( |
|
✔️ Deploy Preview for privacyguides ready! 🔨 Explore the source changes: 4a09eb2 🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/privacyguides/deploys/61893e594aa4ea0007057aa9 😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-254--privacyguides.netlify.app |
Mikaela
added
the
c:providers
Mikaela
requested review from
a team and
Mikaela
and removed request for
a team
|
Agreed, we don't even eat our own dog-food on this. If this was to be re-added I think it would be necessary that there is a criteria. |
|
Well looking at that previous suggestion:
This is something we already do in general across the site.
Those aren't the only two bad countries in the world. We're progressively phasing out mention of "eyes" countries because it is not the only intelligence gathering agreement. See: privacytools/privacytools.io#1437
I can't think of any that aren't? That would be up to the owner, not the hosting service.
Up to individual sysop to make certificates, so in other words the client. I don't know of any hosting providers that don't allow sftp/ssh.
Not inherently private, that depends on what cryptocurrency. You're gonna lose a lot of services if you say they must all take privacy coins like Monero or Zcash for example.
Hosting providers will do this to mitigate DDoS attacks etc. I don't think you'll find any "no logs" hosting providers out there. |
Related Discussion: https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/discussions/207
The hosting provider is subpar right now, it is unclear who the intended audience for this is. I don't think the suggestions are good either.
It is best to remove this for now. I have some idea on which providers to recommend for which purpose, and I will make a PR to readd this section with better quality content later.