Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typos called out by akoshelev #40

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

fix typos called out by akoshelev #40

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck commented Jun 10, 2024

simple typos called out in #32

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated SSH key instructions for provisioning an EC2 instance.
    • Corrected file paths and typos in commands for starting services to improve clarity and accuracy.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
draft ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 10, 2024 6:37pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in the README.md file focus on improving the clarity and accuracy of the SSH key instructions for provisioning an EC2 instance. This includes updating file paths for SSH keys and correcting commands for starting services. Additionally, the repository URL for cloning has been updated to reflect a new source.

Changes

Files Change Summary
README.md Updated SSH key instructions, corrected file paths for SSH keys, fixed typos in service start commands, and changed repository URL.

Poem

In the land of code, where rabbits hop,
We tweaked the keys, no need to stop.
Paths made clear, commands now right,
Services start without a fight.
Repos shifted, a brand new source,
Follow the guide, stay on course! 🐇✨

Warning

Review ran into problems

Problems (1)
  • Git: Failed to clone repository. Please contact CodeRabbit support.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 031145d and dfa2ef8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck requested a review from akoshelev June 10, 2024 18:45
@akoshelev akoshelev merged commit f2f9be8 into main Jun 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck deleted the readme-typos branch June 13, 2024 23:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants