Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hybrid query #1468

Closed

Conversation

eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member

Adding one more layer of plumbing to actually running a hybrid query.

This is an early draft to get some input on the direction. We likely won't want to merge this until @tyurek's work to load the HybridInfo from the reports directly is complete.

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck force-pushed the hybrid-query branch 2 times, most recently from 9c35083 to 5a31178 Compare December 3, 2024 03:01
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 40 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.03%. Comparing base (5015b71) to head (4bff1d6).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ipa-core/src/query/runner/hybrid.rs 0.00% 24 Missing ⚠️
ipa-core/src/query/executor.rs 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1468      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.11%   93.03%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         236      236              
  Lines       42853    42892      +39     
==========================================
  Hits        39903    39903              
- Misses       2950     2989      +39     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@akoshelev akoshelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me, but hard to tell w/o actually running this code

@eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member Author

@akoshelev agreed. this will require an integration test, yea? @tyurek is making progress on #1469, which should then allow us to write an integration test for this.

let ctx = ShardedMaliciousContext::new_with_gate(prss, gateway, gate, sharded);

// TODO: load this from individual reports
let hybrid_info =
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tyurek is it something you would need to fix along with the AAD change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually this should be fixed. I'll find time to rebase this evening

@eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member Author

this is included in #1479, so closing this one.

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck deleted the hybrid-query branch December 7, 2024 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants