Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: generate CPU & PGO profiles #6058

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dwisiswant0
Copy link
Member

@dwisiswant0 dwisiswant0 commented Feb 19, 2025

Proposed changes

Proof of Concept

The following steps demonstrate the process of compiling and benchmarking the nuclei binary with and w/o PGO.

Steps

  1. Compile the test binary and run the benchmark:

    make build-test
    DISABLE_STDOUT=1 ./bin/nuclei.test -test.run - -test.bench=. -test.benchmem -test.count=10 ./cmd/nuclei/ | tee nopgo.txt
  2. Generate CPU profiles:

    go run cmd/nuclei/main.go -u "https://scanme.sh" -profile-mem="nuclei" -no-mhe -silent >/dev/null
    mv nuclei.cpu cmd/nuclei/default.pgo

    Alternatively, extract this PGO file (pgo.zip) into the cmd/nuclei/ directory - Duration: 95.70s, Total samples = 45.96s (48.03%).

  3. Recompile with PGO and rerun the benchmark:

    make build-test
    DISABLE_STDOUT=1 ./bin/nuclei.test -test.run - -test.bench=. -test.benchmem -test.count=10 ./cmd/nuclei/ | tee withpgo.txt

Benchmark Results

$ benchstat nopgo.txt withpgo.txt 
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3/cmd/nuclei
cpu: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-11900H @ 2.50GHz
                  │ nopgo.txt  │         withpgo.txt          │
                  │   sec/op   │   sec/op    vs base          │
RunEnumeration-16   183.0 ± 1%   183.0 ± 1%  ~ (p=0.105 n=10)

                  │  nopgo.txt   │             withpgo.txt             │
                  │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base               │
RunEnumeration-16   3.215Gi ± 0%   3.205Gi ± 0%  -0.32% (p=0.001 n=10)

                  │  nopgo.txt  │            withpgo.txt             │
                  │  allocs/op  │  allocs/op   vs base               │
RunEnumeration-16   33.94M ± 0%   33.83M ± 0%  -0.33% (p=0.001 n=10)

This suggests that PGO can help optimize memory efficiency, although the improvements might not always be dramatic. The effectiveness of PGO largely depends on the quality of the CPU samples used, which can vary based on the workload and profiling data. However, I'm still exploring ways to gather more comprehensive CPU samples - potentially by adjusting types.Options or expanding the number of Targets to improve sampling accuracy. The PGO data in this example was generated using the default types.Options from the CLI with only a single dummy server as the target, which may not fully capture real-world performance patterns.

Checklist

  • Pull request is created against the dev branch
  • All checks passed (lint, unit/integration/regression tests etc.) with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced CPU profiling alongside memory profiling for enhanced performance insights.
    • Added functionality to suppress standard output based on an environment variable for improved configurability.
  • Documentation
    • Updated instructions now cover both CPU and memory profiling, including how to visualize these profiles.
  • Build Enhancements
    • Refined build configurations improve reproducibility and optimize the linking process.
  • Chores
    • Enhanced version control settings exclude additional profiling files to maintain a cleaner repository.

@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested a review from dogancanbakir February 19, 2025 05:45
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/perf-regression.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This pull request expands profiling and tracing support within the application. It updates the exclusion rules in the .gitignore file to ignore new profiling extensions (*.mem and *.cpu), revises the documentation in DESIGN.md to include CPU profiling details, adjusts the build configuration in the Makefile, and enhances the profiling logic in cmd/nuclei/main.go with explicit file naming and refined error handling.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.gitignore Added patterns to ignore *.mem and *.cpu files for profiling and tracing.
DESIGN.md Updated profiling documentation to include CPU profiling commands alongside memory profiling and execution tracing.
Makefile Modified LDFLAGS to append -extldflags "-static", updated GOFLAGS to include -pgo=auto, added conditional CGO settings, and defined build outputs.
cmd/nuclei/main.go Refined profiling logic by explicitly creating .mem and new .cpu profile files, with updated error handling and logging messages.
cmd/nuclei/main_test.go Added a benchmark test function for the enumeration functionality, setting up a dummy HTTP server and processing options for performance evaluation.
pkg/output/output.go Introduced a conditional to suppress standard output based on the DISABLE_STDOUT environment variable, enhancing output configurability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User
    participant App as Application
    participant Mem as Memory Profiler
    participant CPU as CPU Profiler
    participant Logger as Logger

    User->>App: Start Application
    App->>Mem: Initiate Memory Profiling (.mem file)
    App->>CPU: Initiate CPU Profiling (.cpu file)
    App->>Logger: Log profiling start and file creation
    App->>App: Execute processing tasks
    App->>CPU: Stop CPU Profiling
    App->>Mem: Clean up Memory Profiling
    App->>Logger: Log profiling completion/errors
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • Ice3man543
  • dogancanbakir
  • ehsandeep

Poem

I'm a rabbit on the run,
Hopping through code in the sun.
Memory and CPU now meet,
In logs and builds so neat.
With every tweak, our code's begun! 🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cmd/nuclei/main.go (1)

108-156: LGTM! Well-structured profiling implementation.

The changes improve the profiling implementation by:

  1. Using consistent file extensions (.mem, .cpu, .trace)
  2. Adding CPU profiling support
  3. Improving error messages with file names
  4. Proper cleanup in defer function

Consider consolidating the error handling for file creation to reduce code duplication:

-		memProfileFile, err := os.Create(memProfile + ".mem")
-		if err != nil {
-			gologger.Fatal().Msgf("profile: could not create memory profile %q file: %v", memProfileFile.Name(), err)
-		}
-
-		cpuProfileFile, err := os.Create(memProfile + ".cpu")
-		if err != nil {
-			gologger.Fatal().Msgf("profile: could not create CPU profile %q file: %v", cpuProfileFile.Name(), err)
-		}
-
-		traceFile, err := os.Create(memProfile + ".trace")
-		if err != nil {
-			gologger.Fatal().Msgf("profile: could not create trace %q file: %v", traceFile.Name(), err)
-		}
+               createProfileFile := func(ext, profileType string) *os.File {
+                       f, err := os.Create(memProfile + ext)
+                       if err != nil {
+                               gologger.Fatal().Msgf("profile: could not create %s profile %q file: %v", profileType, f.Name(), err)
+                       }
+                       return f
+               }
+
+               memProfileFile := createProfileFile(".mem", "memory")
+               cpuProfileFile := createProfileFile(".cpu", "CPU")
+               traceFile := createProfileFile(".trace", "trace")
DESIGN.md (1)

462-498: LGTM! Comprehensive profiling documentation.

The documentation has been well-updated to include CPU profiling instructions and clear examples for analyzing both CPU and memory profiles.

Fix the bullet point formatting in the file list:

-This command creates three files:  * `nuclei.cpu`: CPU profile * `nuclei.mem`: Memory (heap) profile * `nuclei.trace`: Execution trace
+This command creates three files:
+
+* `nuclei.cpu`: CPU profile
+* `nuclei.mem`: Memory (heap) profile
+* `nuclei.trace`: Execution trace
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~470-~470: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...and creates three files: * nuclei.cpu: CPU profile * nuclei.mem: Memory (hea...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dabcce8 and d53b38b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • .github/workflows/generate-pgo.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .github/workflows/perf-test.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .goreleaser.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • DESIGN.md (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • cmd/nuclei/main.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
DESIGN.md

[uncategorized] ~470-~470: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...and creates three files: * nuclei.cpu: CPU profile * nuclei.mem: Memory (hea...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Lint
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cmd/nuclei/main.go (1)

35-35: LGTM! Added PGO support.

The addition of -pgo=auto to GOFLAGS enables Profile-Guided Optimization, which can improve runtime performance by optimizing the code based on profiling data.

.gitignore (1)

48-53: LGTM! Added patterns for profiling files.

The changes correctly add patterns to ignore the new profiling file extensions (*.mem, *.cpu) while maintaining the existing *.trace pattern.

Makefile (3)

13-15: Static Linking Flag Update
Appending -extldflags "-static" to LDFLAGS (instead of overwriting it) ensures that any pre-existing linker flags remain intact while enforcing static linking on non-Darwin systems. This approach aligns well with the profiling requirements to create consistent builds.


32-32: Enhanced Build Reproducibility with -trimpath
Introducing the -trimpath flag in the build command helps remove local file system paths from the compiled binary, thereby improving build reproducibility. This is a beneficial change given the focus on profiling and performance optimizations.


35-35: Incorporating PGO Support in GOFLAGS
The update of GOFLAGS to include -pgo=auto ensures that profile-guided optimization is applied during the build process. This change directly supports the PR’s objective of generating CPU and PGO profiles. Just verify that your build tooling and environment fully support this flag to avoid any unexpected behavior.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cmd/nuclei/main.go (2)

119-121: Consider using a struct to manage profile files.

While the current implementation works, managing multiple profile files could be improved by using a struct to encapsulate the file handles and their cleanup logic.

+type profileFiles struct {
+    mem   *os.File
+    cpu   *os.File
+    trace *os.File
+}
+
+func (p *profileFiles) cleanup() {
+    if p.mem != nil {
+        p.mem.Close()
+    }
+    if p.cpu != nil {
+        p.cpu.Close()
+    }
+    if p.trace != nil {
+        p.trace.Close()
+    }
+}

136-152: Consider adding error handling for file close operations.

The deferred cleanup function should handle potential errors when closing files.

 defer func() {
     if err := pprof.WriteHeapProfile(memProfileFile); err != nil {
         gologger.Fatal().Msgf("profile: could not write memory profile: %v", err)
     }
     pprof.StopCPUProfile()
-    memProfileFile.Close()
-    traceFile.Close()
+    if err := memProfileFile.Close(); err != nil {
+        gologger.Warning().Msgf("profile: could not close memory profile: %v", err)
+    }
+    if err := traceFile.Close(); err != nil {
+        gologger.Warning().Msgf("profile: could not close trace file: %v", err)
+    }
     trace.Stop()
     runtime.MemProfileRate = oldMemProfileRate
     gologger.Info().Msgf("CPU profile saved at %q", cpuProfileFile.Name())
     gologger.Info().Msgf("Memory usage snapshot saved at %q", memProfileFile.Name())
     gologger.Info().Msgf("Traced at %q", traceFile.Name())
 }()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d53b38b and b01eee7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • cmd/nuclei/main.go (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Lint
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cmd/nuclei/main.go (2)

111-117: LGTM! Well-structured helper function for profile file creation.

The createProfileFile helper function effectively standardizes profile file creation with proper error handling and clear error messages.


131-134: LGTM! Proper CPU profiling setup.

The CPU profiling setup is correctly implemented with proper error handling.

Makefile (3)

14-14: LGTM! Proper LDFLAGS appending.

Using += instead of = correctly preserves existing linker flags while adding static linking.


29-30: Consider using environment variable for CGO setting.

Setting CGO_ENABLED directly in the command might affect global state.


32-32:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify PGO profile availability.

The -pgo=auto flag requires a default.pgo profile to be present in the package directory for optimization.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if default.pgo exists in the package directory
find . -name "default.pgo" -type f

Length of output: 34


PGO Profile Verification Required

It appears that no default.pgo file was found in the repository (as confirmed by running the search command), yet the build target in the Makefile at line 32 uses the -pgo=auto flag which expects this file. Please manually verify that the default.pgo file is either intentionally omitted or should be generated/placed in the correct directory. If the absence of this file is unintended, either add it to enable profile-guided optimizations or remove the -pgo=auto flag to avoid potential build issues.

@dwisiswant0 dwisiswant0 marked this pull request as draft February 19, 2025 11:06
also adjust memory (heap) profiles ext to `.mem`

Signed-off-by: Dwi Siswanto <[email protected]>
and append LDFLAGS ifneq "darwin"

Signed-off-by: Dwi Siswanto <[email protected]>
* replace `go mod tidy` with `go mod download` and
  `go mod verify`
* adjust indentations
* add `-trimpath` flag
* set `-pgo` flag to "`auto`"
* add `ldflags`
* quoting 386 GOARCH value

Signed-off-by: Dwi Siswanto <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dwi Siswanto <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dwi Siswanto <[email protected]>
@dwisiswant0 dwisiswant0 force-pushed the dwisiswant0/feat/generate-CPU-profiles branch from 6e048dd to a7456e7 Compare February 20, 2025 11:13
@dwisiswant0 dwisiswant0 marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 11:14
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
cmd/nuclei/main_test.go (1)

16-87: LGTM! The benchmark test is well-structured.

The benchmark test is well-implemented with proper setup, cleanup, and error handling. The test server and options configuration provide a good baseline for performance testing.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Add different payload sizes and response types to benchmark various scenarios.
  2. Add sub-benchmarks using b.Run() to test different configurations:
func BenchmarkRunEnumeration(b *testing.B) {
    testCases := []struct {
        name string
        responseStatus int
        bulkSize int
        templateThreads int
    }{
        {"SmallPayload204", http.StatusNoContent, 25, 25},
        {"LargePayload200", http.StatusOK, 50, 50},
        // Add more cases...
    }
    
    for _, tc := range testCases {
        b.Run(tc.name, func(b *testing.B) {
            // Existing benchmark code with tc parameters
        })
    }
}
DESIGN.md (4)

468-472: Improve Markdown List Styling
The list items that describe the files created (lines 468–472) currently use asterisks. According to markdownlint (MD004), using dashes for unordered lists is preferred for consistency. Consider updating the list items as follows:

- * `nuclei.cpu`: CPU profile
- * `nuclei.mem`: Memory (heap) profile
- * `nuclei.trace`: Execution trace
+ - `nuclei.cpu`: CPU profile
+ - `nuclei.mem`: Memory (heap) profile
+ - `nuclei.trace`: Execution trace

This change will help maintain a consistent style in the document.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~470-~470: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...and creates three files: * nuclei.cpu: CPU profile * nuclei.mem: Memory (hea...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

470-470: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


471-471: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


472-472: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


476-480: Consistent List Formatting in Analysis Steps
In the "Analyzing the CPU/Memory Profiles" section (starting at line 476), the instruction items (e.g., “* View the profile in the terminal:”) also use asterisks. For consistency with the project’s markdown style guidelines, please switch these to dashes. Ensure that all similar list items (including those in subsequent analysis steps) follow the dash style.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

476-476: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


488-492: Uniform List Style for Additional Analysis Steps
Similar to the previous list styling comment, the list item for "Display top memory consumers:" (lines 488–492) should also use a dash instead of an asterisk for consistency.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

488-488: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


494-498: Standardize Web-Based Visualization List Formatting
The list item introducing the web-based visualization command (lines 494–498) uses an asterisk. For uniformity across the document, update this to a dash.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

494-494: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b01eee7 and a7456e7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • .github/workflows/generate-pgo.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .github/workflows/perf-regression.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .github/workflows/perf-test.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .github/workflows/tests.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
  • .goreleaser.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • DESIGN.md (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • cmd/nuclei/main.go (2 hunks)
  • cmd/nuclei/main_test.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/output/output.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
DESIGN.md

[uncategorized] ~470-~470: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...and creates three files: * nuclei.cpu: CPU profile * nuclei.mem: Memory (hea...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
DESIGN.md

470-470: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


471-471: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


472-472: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


476-476: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


482-482: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


484-484: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


488-488: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


494-494: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Tests (macOS-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Tests (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
pkg/output/output.go (1)

75-75: LGTM! Clean implementation of stdout control.

The addition of DisableStdout field and its environment variable control is well-implemented. This feature is particularly useful for benchmarking and testing scenarios where stdout noise needs to be suppressed.

Also applies to: 283-285

cmd/nuclei/main.go (4)

109-117: LGTM! Well-structured helper function for profile file creation.

The createProfileFile helper function provides a clean abstraction for creating profile files with proper error handling.


119-121: LGTM! Consistent profile file creation.

The profile files are created consistently using the helper function with appropriate extensions and types.


131-134: LGTM! Proper CPU profiling setup.

CPU profiling is correctly initialized with proper error handling.


137-152: LGTM! Comprehensive cleanup and logging.

The cleanup logic is thorough:

  1. Writes heap memory snapshot
  2. Stops CPU profiling
  3. Closes all profile files
  4. Provides clear logging of profile locations
Makefile (3)

14-14: LGTM! Improved LDFLAGS handling.

Using += instead of = for LDFLAGS preserves any existing flags while adding static linking for non-Darwin systems.


29-30: LGTM! Enhanced build flags.

The addition of -trimpath improves build reproducibility by removing file system paths from the binary.


32-33: LGTM! Well-structured test build target.

The new build-test target is properly configured with:

  1. PGO auto flag for profile-guided optimization
  2. Separate output path for test binary
  3. CGO disabled for better portability

Also applies to: 37-44

DESIGN.md (4)

460-463: Clear Introduction to Profiling & Tracing
The updated introduction (lines 460–463) clearly explains that users can generate CPU and memory profiles plus an execution trace using the -profile-mem flag. This enhancement aligns well with the PR objective of expanding profiling support.


482-486: Verification of Code Block Annotations
The code blocks used for the profiling commands already specify a language (using ```bash), which is good practice as it improves readability and syntax highlighting. No changes needed here.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

482-482: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


484-484: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


500-508: Comprehensive Trace File Analysis Section
The section detailing how to analyze the trace file (lines 500–508) is clear and complete. It effectively guides users to examine the execution trace using the go tool trace command, which supports the PR’s objective of enhanced profiling.


560-562: Overall Section Clarity & Completeness
The updated "Profiling and Tracing" section now comprehensively covers the process—from profile generation to analysis—with clear, step-by-step instructions and relevant code snippets. This aligns well with the PR’s goal of providing CPU and PGO profile support and adds valuable insight into performance diagnostics for the user.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants