Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleaning #149

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023
Merged

cleaning #149

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

BaxterEaves
Copy link
Contributor

  • Changed licenses in files
  • Misc cleaning in code

@BaxterEaves BaxterEaves requested a review from Swandog November 14, 2023 14:52
@BaxterEaves BaxterEaves requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2023 14:52
Copy link
Contributor

@Swandog Swandog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question, beyond my expertise, but otherwise LGTM

Comment on lines +554 to +556
col_ixs.drain(..).for_each(|col_ix| {
self.reassign_col_gibbs(col_ix, draw_alpha, rng);
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we not need to update self.loglike anymore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no. it gets updated by step .

self.loglike = self.loglike();

@BaxterEaves BaxterEaves merged commit bcf464e into release/0.5.0 Nov 14, 2023
20 of 21 checks passed
@schmidmt schmidmt deleted the bugfix/0.5.0-score branch May 6, 2024 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants