(maint) Constrain orchestrator_client to < 0.7.1 #528
+31
−23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t 0.7.1 by pinning to an old version until fixed
6 tasks
mcdonaldseanp
approved these changes
Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Based on puppetlabs/puppetlabs-puppet_agent#743 to fix an issue with the version 0.7.1 of orchestrator_client
"The 0.7.1 release of orchestrator_client broadened its dependency on Faraday (see puppetlabs/orchestrator_client-ruby@6f8661e). This change has caused Bundler to resolve Faraday in unexpected ways when there are other Gems with dependencies on Faraday.
This commit constrains orchestrator_client to < 0.7.1 until this issue is resolved."
Additional Context
Add any additional context about the problem here.
Related Issues (if any)
rubygems/rubygems#8286
Checklist
Changes include test coverage?
Have you updated the documentation?