Comment-highlight tests and fixing wrong doc-string highlight left from Haskell #40
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hi-Angel
force-pushed
the
more-tests2
branch
4 times, most recently
from
e2ed04a to
0c4ba30
Compare
Hi-Angel
changed the title
As described in the test and the commentary, PureScript doesn't consider a "no-bar" comment that follows documentation part of the documentation. It is an explicitly documented behavior that is different from Haskell.
The variable exists since Emacs 21 at least, so this check serves no purpose.
Hi-Angel
force-pushed
the
more-tests2
branch
from
0c4ba30 to
81d0cbc
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.