Fix: minor text updates following carols enhancements (#84)

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
 # pyosmeta Changelog
 
 [![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/pyosmeta.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/pyosmeta/)
+
+## Unreleased
+
+## v.0.2

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ reviews editor, reviewers and package authors / maintainers. This information al
 2. Update the pyOpenSci website's package listing with the package's DOI, documentation URL.
 3. Update the package's stats including stars, contributors, etc. using the GitHub API
 
-## process\_reviews.py script
+## process_reviews.py script
 
 To run this script, you can call the following at the command line:
 

src/pyosmeta/cli/update_review_teams.py

@@ -5,20 +5,19 @@
 ensure all packages they supported are listed there.
 1b: And that they have a listing as peer-review under contributor type
 2. Updates the packages metadata with the participants names if it's missing
-3. FUTURE: finally it looks to see if we are missing review participants from
+3. Finally it looks to see if we are missing review participants from
 the review issues in the contributor file and updates that file.
 
 This script assumes that update_contributors and update_reviews has been run.
 Rather than hit any api's it just updates information from the issues.
 To run: update_reviewers
 
 # TODO - FEATURE we have some packages that were NOT approved but we had
-# editors and reviewers.
-# We need to acknowledge these people as well. maybe tag them with waiting on
-# maintainer response??
+# editors and reviewers who participated. We need to acknowledge these people
+# Make sure each issue is tagged "on hold" and then parse contributions
 # TODO: package-wide feature: create no update flag for entries
-# TODO: make sure we can add a 3rd or 4th reviewer - crowsetta has this as
-# will biocypher
+# TODO: make sure the script recognizes a 3rd or 4th reviewer - crowsetta has
+# this as will biocypher
 
 """
 import os