Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write submission script to temp #501

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced job submission process by including a path for a temporary submission script.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No bug fixes were introduced in this release.
  • Documentation

    • No changes to documentation were made.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the modification of the execute_with_pysqa function within executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py. A new import statement for the tempfile module has been added, and a new key, "submission_script_path", is introduced to the submit_kwargs dictionary, which holds the name of a temporary file created by tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(). The overall logic of the function remains the same, with no alterations to the _pysqa_execute_command function.

Changes

File Change Summary
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py Added import tempfile and modified execute_with_pysqa to include a new key in submit_kwargs: "submission_script_path" with a temporary file's name.

Possibly related PRs

  • Cache: Use absolute path for working directory #462: The changes in this PR also modify the execute_with_pysqa function, specifically altering the submit_kwargs dictionary, which indicates a direct connection to the main PR's modifications in the same function.

Poem

In the burrow where scripts do play,
A temp file's path now leads the way.
With submit_kwargs dressed anew,
Jobs will hop along, it's true!
A little change, a grand delight,
In our queue, all feels just right! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 294965d and 43ab05d.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft November 15, 2024 21:54
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py (1)

57-57: Consider queue system requirements for submission scripts

The temporary file handling should align with the queue system's requirements:

  1. Some queue systems might need to access the submission script during job execution
  2. The script location might need specific permissions or path requirements
  3. Cleanup timing should consider the job's lifecycle

Consider:

  1. Documenting the queue system's requirements for submission scripts
  2. Moving temporary files to a designated directory with appropriate permissions
  3. Implementing a cleanup strategy based on job status (e.g., after job completion)
  4. Adding configuration options for submission script handling

Would you like me to help create a more comprehensive solution that addresses these architectural concerns?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

57-57: Use a context manager for opening files

(SIM115)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 294965d and 43ab05d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py

57-57: Use a context manager for opening files

(SIM115)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py (2)

3-3: LGTM!

The tempfile import is appropriately placed with other standard library imports.


57-57: Verify queue system compatibility

Let's verify how the submission script path is used across different queue systems.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about how the submission script path is used within the queue spawner implementation.


Using NamedTemporaryFile().name is safe in this context

The verification shows that the temporary file path is used correctly within the queue submission context:

  1. The submission_script_path is only used as a parameter in submit_kwargs for the QueueAdapter.submit_job() method
  2. The implementation is self-contained within the queue_spawner.py file
  3. The temporary file handling follows Python's standard practice using the tempfile module
  4. The path is used as a parameter value and not directly manipulated or accessed elsewhere in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for queue system specific implementations and usage of submission scripts
echo "Searching for queue system implementations..."
rg -l "QueueAdapter|submit_job" 

echo "Checking submission script usage..."
rg "submission_script" 

echo "Looking for existing temporary file handling..."
rg "tempfile|mkstemp" 

Length of output: 671


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation details of queue_spawner.py
echo "Content of queue_spawner.py:"
cat executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py

# Search for any test files related to queue spawner
echo -e "\nSearching for related test files:"
fd "test.*queue.*" --type f

Length of output: 4494

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

57-57: Use a context manager for opening files

(SIM115)

@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ def execute_with_pysqa(
"command": " ".join(command),
"dependency_list": [str(qid) for qid in task_dependent_lst],
"working_directory": os.path.abspath(cwd),
"submission_script_path": tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile().name,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Improve temporary file handling

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. The temporary file might be deleted before the queue system can access it
  2. No proper resource cleanup
  3. Missing error handling
  4. File permissions aren't explicitly set

Here's a safer implementation:

-            "submission_script_path": tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile().name,
+            "submission_script_path": tempfile.mkstemp(prefix="job_", suffix=".sh", text=True)[1],

Additionally, consider implementing proper cleanup:

def execute_with_pysqa(...):
    temp_files = []
    try:
        # Create temp file with mkstemp
        fd, temp_path = tempfile.mkstemp(prefix="job_", suffix=".sh", text=True)
        os.close(fd)  # Close the file descriptor
        temp_files.append(temp_path)
        
        submit_kwargs = {
            # ... other kwargs ...
            "submission_script_path": temp_path,
        }
        # ... rest of the function ...
    finally:
        # Cleanup temp files after job submission
        for temp_file in temp_files:
            try:
                if os.path.exists(temp_file):
                    os.remove(temp_file)
            except OSError:
                pass  # Best effort cleanup

This solution:

  1. Uses mkstemp to create a persistent temporary file
  2. Implements proper cleanup after job submission
  3. Uses appropriate file permissions
  4. Includes error handling
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

57-57: Use a context manager for opening files

(SIM115)

@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the pysqa_submission_script_path branch November 15, 2024 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant