Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test HPC Submission Mode Notebook again #505

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced readability of the Jupyter notebook by consolidating markdown content and removing unnecessary line breaks.
    • Added executable Python code snippets for HPC submission modes, including function definitions and examples.
  • Updates

    • Updated the notebook's execution environment to the Flux framework, including changes to kernel specifications and versioning.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Jupyter notebook notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb, focusing on High-Performance Computing (HPC) submission modes. Key changes include consolidating markdown content into single-line strings for improved readability, converting several markdown cells into executable code cells with Python snippets, and updating the notebook's metadata to reflect a new kernel specification and version aligned with the Flux framework.

Changes

File Change Summary
notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb - Consolidated markdown cells into single-line strings.
- Converted markdown cells to code cells with Python functions (add_funct, calc) and Executor class examples.
- Updated kernel specification from "Python 3 (ipykernel)" to "Flux" and version from "3.12.5" to "3.12.7".

Possibly related PRs

  • New examples for the updated documentation #495: The changes in the main PR involve modifications to the notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb, which is directly related to the new examples introduced in the notebooks/1-local.ipynb and notebooks/3-hpc-allocation.ipynb that also utilize the Executor class, indicating a shared focus on HPC and task execution.

Poem

In the notebook where bunnies play,
HPC's magic lights the way.
Functions hop and code cells gleam,
With Flux, we chase the data dream.
Consolidated lines, so neat and bright,
In the world of compute, we take flight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb (2)

Line range hint 160-183: Consider enhancing cache cleanup error handling

The current cache cleanup implementation could benefit from more specific error handling and logging. Consider adding specific exception types and logging for better debugging.

 import os
 import shutil
+import logging
 
 cache_dir = "./cache"
 if os.path.exists(cache_dir):
     print(os.listdir(cache_dir))
     try:
         shutil.rmtree(cache_dir)
-    except OSError:
+    except OSError as e:
+        logging.warning(f"Failed to clean cache directory: {e}")
         pass

Line range hint 1-218: Consider adding testing instructions

The notebook effectively demonstrates HPC submission modes, but it would be beneficial to add:

  1. Instructions for testing the examples locally
  2. Expected output examples
  3. Common troubleshooting scenarios

This would help users verify their setup and debug issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6adbf5f and 17af45b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
notebooks/2-hpc-submission.ipynb (1)

199-201: Verify Flux framework compatibility

The kernel has been updated to use Flux with Python 3.12.7. Please ensure that:

  1. The Flux framework is fully compatible with Python 3.12.7
  2. All dependencies used in the notebook examples work with this Python version

Also applies to: 213-213

@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the notebook_test branch November 20, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant