Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use dataclass interface to spglib symmetry #248

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Use dataclass interface to spglib symmetry #248

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

pmrv
Copy link
Contributor

@pmrv pmrv commented Aug 27, 2024

spglib.get_symmetry_dataset now returns a dataclass and throws warnings on getitem. This affects our Symmetry class when using the .info attribute.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the symmetry dataset output by converting it into a more accessible dictionary format, improving usability for end-users.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Maintained existing error handling for cases where the symmetry dataset is None, ensuring stability.

spglib.get_symmetry_dataset now returns a dataclass and throws warnings
on __getitem__.  This affects our Symmetry class when using the .info
attribute.
@pmrv pmrv requested a review from jan-janssen as a code owner August 27, 2024 18:20
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The modification in the symmetry.py file involves changing the info method of a class to use dataclasses.asdict for converting the output of spglib.get_symmetry_dataset into a dictionary format. This affects the output structure while maintaining the existing control flow and error handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py Updated the info method to use dataclasses.asdict for converting the symmetry dataset output into a dictionary format.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where changes bloom,
A method transformed, dispelling the gloom.
From lists to dicts, a clearer sight,
Data now dances, oh what a delight!
With every new line, the rabbits cheer,
For structured data brings us near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcb4ade and aea0f7d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py (1)

345-350: LGTM! Ensure downstream compatibility.

The use of dataclasses.asdict to convert the output of spglib.get_symmetry_dataset into a dictionary format is correct and enhances usability. However, ensure that any downstream logic that relies on the structure of the returned data is updated to accommodate this change.

The code changes are approved.

Run the following script to verify the impact on downstream logic:

Verification successful

Downstream Logic Verified: No Issues Found

The change to use dataclasses.asdict in the info property method is compatible with the existing codebase. The tests in tests/test_symmetry.py and tests/test_analyse_symmetry.py confirm that the dictionary format is expected and should work as intended. Ensure that the dictionary keys remain consistent with previous versions to avoid any issues.

  • No changes needed in the downstream logic as per the current test coverage.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the updated `info` property method on downstream logic.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `info` property. Expect: Ensure compatibility with the new dictionary format.
rg --type python -A 5 $'info'

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Corrected: Verify the impact of the updated `info` property method on downstream logic.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `info` property. Expect: Ensure compatibility with the new dictionary format.
rg --type py -A 5 $'info'

Length of output: 21236

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@pmrv As far as I understand dataclasses were only recently introduced in spglib in 2.5.0: https://github.com/spglib/spglib/releases - so this means we have to update the lower bound to 2.5.0 as well. The release is 1.5 months old, so I am fine with upgrading the lower bound we just have to check if it can have any other implications.

@pmrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmrv commented Aug 27, 2024

Right, I hadn't considered. I'll put a patch tomorrow so that old versions work too.

@pmrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmrv commented Aug 27, 2024


* Maintained existing error handling for cases where the symmetry dataset is `None`, ensuring stability

Note to myself: This is wrong, the commit actually introduces a new bug when the returned info is None.

spglib<2.5 returns a dict, not a dataclass, so apply asdict only when necessary.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aea0f7d and 7edd439.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7edd439 and eadcf10.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • structuretoolkit/analyse/symmetry.py

Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@pmrv pmrv merged commit c489507 into main Aug 28, 2024
14 checks passed
@pmrv pmrv deleted the sd2 branch August 28, 2024 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants