You're correct that it's generally straightforward to derive a private key from a mnemonic phrase, but the reverse process (deriving a mnemonic from a private key) is not typically possible or standardized. Here's why:
-
Mnemonic to Private Key:
- This is a one-way process defined by standards like BIP39 (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 39).
- The mnemonic phrase contains more information than just the private key. It includes a checksum and potentially additional metadata.
- The process involves:
- Converting the mnemonic words to a binary seed.
- Using this seed to generate the master private key.
- Deriving child keys if needed (for HD wallets).
-
Private Key to Mnemonic:
- This is not standardly possible because:
- The private key doesn't contain the additional information present in the mnemonic (like the checksum).
- Multiple different mnemonics could potentially generate the same private key.
- The mnemonic creation process involves randomness that isn't captured in the private key alone.
- This is not standardly possible because:
For the cryptocurrencies you mentioned (Ethereum, Bitcoin, Cosmos, Solana):
- Ethereum: As you showed, libraries like
eth_account
can derive keys from mnemonics but not vice versa. - Bitcoin: Libraries like
bitcoinlib
work similarly. - Cosmos: The
cosmos-sdk
follows the same principle. - Solana: Tools like
@solana/web3.js
also derive keys from mnemonics but not the reverse.
In practice, if you need to "recover" a mnemonic-like representation from a private key, you would typically:
- Generate a new mnemonic.
- Derive its corresponding private key.
- Replace this derived private key with your actual private key.
This creates a new, valid mnemonic-private key pair, but it's not recovering the original mnemonic. It's creating a new one that happens to produce the same private key.
Remember, for security reasons, it's generally recommended to start with a mnemonic and derive keys from it, rather than starting with raw private keys.