Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use explicit list of configured/available VINs #274

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

jschlyter
Copy link
Contributor

@jschlyter jschlyter commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method to retrieve available VINs dynamically.
    • Added a new attribute to track available VINs after querying the API.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for VIN retrieval, raising clearer exceptions when a VIN is not available.
  • Documentation

    • Updated logging to reflect changes in VIN retrieval methods.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the Polestar API integration, focusing on how vehicle identification numbers (VINs) are retrieved and managed. The modifications span across multiple files in the custom components, updating the logic for VIN retrieval, tracking, and validation. The changes centralize VIN management within the PolestarApi class, adding an available_vins attribute and a new get_available_vins() method to provide a more robust approach to handling vehicle identifiers.

Changes

File Change Summary
custom_components/polestar_api/config_flow.py Updated _test_credentials method to use get_available_vins() instead of direct vins attribute access
custom_components/polestar_api/polestar.py Modified get_cars() method to retrieve VINs using get_available_vins() method
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py - Added available_vins attribute
- Removed vins property
- Added get_available_vins() method
- Updated VIN validation logic in various methods

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ConfigFlow
    participant PolestarApi
    participant Coordinator

    User->>ConfigFlow: Initiate Configuration
    ConfigFlow->>PolestarApi: get_available_vins()
    PolestarApi-->>ConfigFlow: Return Available VINs
    ConfigFlow->>ConfigFlow: Validate VINs
    ConfigFlow-->>User: Configuration Result
Loading

Poem

🚗 Rabbits hop, VINs dance light,
Through APIs, a clearer sight
Tracking cars with wisdom's grace,
No more guessing in this space
Polestar's secrets now unfurled! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jschlyter jschlyter marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 16:44
@jschlyter jschlyter requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2024 16:44
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (2)

85-91: Consider enhancing the warning message for missing VINs.

While the logic is correct, the warning message could be more informative.

Consider this improvement:

-            self.logger.warning("Could not found configured VINs %s", missing_vins)
+            self.logger.warning(
+                "Configured VINs %s were not found in available VINs %s",
+                missing_vins,
+                self.available_vins
+            )

109-110: Consider standardizing error messages across VIN validation.

The KeyError without context might not be as helpful for debugging.

Consider wrapping the KeyError with more context:

-            raise KeyError(vin)
+            raise KeyError(f"VIN {vin} not found in available VINs: {self.available_vins}")

Also applies to: 129-130, 149-150

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a86f906 and 27a5373.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/config_flow.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/polestar.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
custom_components/polestar_api/config_flow.py (1)

90-90: LGTM! Clean migration to new VIN retrieval method.

The change correctly uses the new get_available_vins() method while maintaining existing error handling logic.

custom_components/polestar_api/polestar.py (1)

243-243: LGTM! Consistent with new VIN management approach.

The list comprehension correctly uses the new get_available_vins() method to iterate over available VINs.

custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (3)

56-56: LGTM! Good initialization of available VINs set.

The empty set initialization is appropriate for tracking available VINs.


93-95: LGTM! Clean implementation of VIN retrieval method.

The method provides a clear interface for accessing available VINs.


Line range hint 56-150: Verify the impact of VIN validation changes.

Let's verify that all VIN validation changes are consistent across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for VIN-related patterns more broadly to verify the consistency of validation across the codebase.


VIN validation is consistently implemented across the codebase

The VIN validation follows a consistent pattern throughout the codebase:

  • All data retrieval methods (get_car_information, get_car_battery, get_car_odometer) properly validate VINs against available_vins
  • The config flow correctly validates VINs during setup
  • VIN management is centralized through the available_vins set and get_available_vins() method
  • Proper error handling is in place with appropriate exceptions (KeyError, VinNotFoundException)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct VIN access patterns
rg -l "\.vins\b" --type py

# Search for potential VIN validation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'if $vin not in $_'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for VIN validation patterns more broadly
rg -A 2 "vin.*not in" --type py

# Search for available_vins usage
rg -A 2 "available_vins" --type py

# Search for any VIN-related validation or access
rg -A 2 "\bvin\b.*self\." --type py

Length of output: 6589

@jschlyter jschlyter merged commit 0f9253d into pypolestar:main Dec 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@jschlyter jschlyter deleted the check_vins branch December 17, 2024 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant