-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use explicit list of configured/available VINs #274
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Polestar API integration, focusing on how vehicle identification numbers (VINs) are retrieved and managed. The modifications span across multiple files in the custom components, updating the logic for VIN retrieval, tracking, and validation. The changes centralize VIN management within the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ConfigFlow
participant PolestarApi
participant Coordinator
User->>ConfigFlow: Initiate Configuration
ConfigFlow->>PolestarApi: get_available_vins()
PolestarApi-->>ConfigFlow: Return Available VINs
ConfigFlow->>ConfigFlow: Validate VINs
ConfigFlow-->>User: Configuration Result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (2)
85-91
: Consider enhancing the warning message for missing VINs.While the logic is correct, the warning message could be more informative.
Consider this improvement:
- self.logger.warning("Could not found configured VINs %s", missing_vins) + self.logger.warning( + "Configured VINs %s were not found in available VINs %s", + missing_vins, + self.available_vins + )
109-110
: Consider standardizing error messages across VIN validation.The KeyError without context might not be as helpful for debugging.
Consider wrapping the KeyError with more context:
- raise KeyError(vin) + raise KeyError(f"VIN {vin} not found in available VINs: {self.available_vins}")Also applies to: 129-130, 149-150
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
custom_components/polestar_api/config_flow.py
(1 hunks)custom_components/polestar_api/polestar.py
(1 hunks)custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py
(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
custom_components/polestar_api/config_flow.py (1)
90-90
: LGTM! Clean migration to new VIN retrieval method.
The change correctly uses the new get_available_vins()
method while maintaining existing error handling logic.
custom_components/polestar_api/polestar.py (1)
243-243
: LGTM! Consistent with new VIN management approach.
The list comprehension correctly uses the new get_available_vins()
method to iterate over available VINs.
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (3)
56-56
: LGTM! Good initialization of available VINs set.
The empty set initialization is appropriate for tracking available VINs.
93-95
: LGTM! Clean implementation of VIN retrieval method.
The method provides a clear interface for accessing available VINs.
Line range hint 56-150
: Verify the impact of VIN validation changes.
Let's verify that all VIN validation changes are consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for VIN-related patterns more broadly to verify the consistency of validation across the codebase.
VIN validation is consistently implemented across the codebase
The VIN validation follows a consistent pattern throughout the codebase:
- All data retrieval methods (
get_car_information
,get_car_battery
,get_car_odometer
) properly validate VINs againstavailable_vins
- The config flow correctly validates VINs during setup
- VIN management is centralized through the
available_vins
set andget_available_vins()
method - Proper error handling is in place with appropriate exceptions (KeyError, VinNotFoundException)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct VIN access patterns
rg -l "\.vins\b" --type py
# Search for potential VIN validation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'if $vin not in $_'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for VIN validation patterns more broadly
rg -A 2 "vin.*not in" --type py
# Search for available_vins usage
rg -A 2 "available_vins" --type py
# Search for any VIN-related validation or access
rg -A 2 "\bvin\b.*self\." --type py
Length of output: 6589
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation