Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.13.1 #285

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Release 1.13.1 #285

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

jschlyter
Copy link
Contributor

@jschlyter jschlyter commented Jan 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Version Update

    • Updated Polestar API component version from 1.13.0 to 1.13.1
  • Code Improvement

    • Enhanced token retrieval process to ensure a new token is fetched regardless of current validity.
    • Refined control flow in the token retrieval method for improved clarity.

@jschlyter jschlyter requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2025 14:38
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating the version number for the Polestar API component in the manifest file from "1.13.0" to "1.13.1" and refining the token retrieval method in the authentication module. The get_token method in the PolestarAuth class has been modified to include a return statement after the token refresh operation, clarifying the control flow. Additionally, the get_ev_data method in the PolestarApi class has been updated to call get_token() with a force=True argument to ensure a new token is fetched.

Changes

File Change Summary
custom_components/polestar_api/manifest.json Version updated from "1.13.0" to "1.13.1"
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/auth.py Modified get_token method to add return statement after token refresh
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py Updated get_ev_data method to call get_token() with force=True

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • BJReplay

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Token Refresh 🔑

Version bumped with gentle care,
Token logic now more fair,
A return statement, crisp and bright,
Guiding auth with rabbit might!

Hop, hop, code refines its way! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jschlyter jschlyter changed the title Prepare for release 1.13.1 Release 1.13.1 Jan 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (1)

200-200: Consider potential rate-limiting and performance overhead from forced token refresh.

While forcing a token refresh ensures a valid token for subsequent calls, continuously calling get_token(force=True) might result in unnecessary requests if this method is called too frequently. If possible, confirm that you will not exceed your API’s rate limits and avoid redundant token fetching in rapid succession.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a847642 and 5038a9b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/auth.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/polestar.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/manifest.json
  • custom_components/polestar_api/pypolestar/auth.py

@jschlyter jschlyter requested a review from BJReplay January 5, 2025 19:21
@jschlyter jschlyter merged commit d5eebce into main Jan 6, 2025
13 checks passed
@jschlyter jschlyter deleted the release/1.13.1 branch January 6, 2025 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants