-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New faster Queue with capacity >= 0 #473
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a1ac052
new Queue with multi_get() and max_size>=0
sorcio 77158e4
remove multi_get for now
sorcio df04db5
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:python-trio/trio into new-queue
sorcio 7cb8e14
remove leftover from multi_get
sorcio b379070
mention Queue(0) as a special case in the reference
sorcio 535bd80
add #473 towncrier entry
sorcio a901400
test Queue(0) as a lock
sorcio 73dc3e8
Merge branch 'master' of python-trio/trio into new-queue
sorcio 738ec8b
switch to outcome.Value in _sync.py
sorcio 8c92729
assert instead of branch for better coverage
sorcio File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
Add support for :class:`trio.Queue` with `capacity=0`. Queues implementation is | ||
also faster now. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For a bit more checking of unbuffered
Queue
, I'd suggest adding aQueueLock1(0)
to thelock_factories
andlock_factory_names
lists in this file.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this works. Attempting acquire the lock (i.e.
await queue.put()
) will block indefinitely. I definitely like idea to testQueue(0)
as used for explicit synchronization though, so I may add a test that relies on rendezvous behaviour.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh duh, of course you're right.