-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider property access from class objects in checkmember.py #18504
Open
sterliakov
wants to merge
12
commits into
python:master
Choose a base branch
from
sterliakov:bugfix/st-property-on-class-checkmember
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
de85cfa
Check property access from class object
sterliakov 3dcf759
Adjust the failing test
sterliakov 9c739b3
Reveal `property` at class level too
sterliakov 6c45c3f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bugfix/st-propert…
sterliakov 5f9e15a
Only note if the replacement is also a Decorator
sterliakov 8db72ed
Handle overloaded case consistently
sterliakov d46ba12
Exit earlier for incremental mode, but still check properties
sterliakov a8f44b9
Revert change to recurse_into_functions, only analyze decorators on d…
sterliakov 9833179
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bugfix/st-propert…
sterliakov 6ab9453
This should work for all redefinitions
sterliakov baf5528
Only add note if we see .setter or .deleter
sterliakov ef68217
Fix typing
sterliakov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a major change, though. IMO the updated behavior is correct: even if the function is untyped, it still shouldn't be allowed to have invalid
@override
attached. We won't check its superclass compatibility unless--check-untyped-defs
is set (check_override_compatibility
flag down the road).