Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/patch extra lines before and after #1112

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 11, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Implemented granular control over patch extension by introducing separate patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after parameters.
  • Updated core functions in git_patch_processing.py and pr_processing.py to utilize the new patch extension parameters.
  • Modified configuration to set patch_extra_lines_before to 4 and patch_extra_lines_after to 2.
  • Increased max_context_tokens from 10000 to 16000 for code suggestions.
  • Added support for the 'claude-3-5-sonnet' model with a 100000 token limit.
  • Updated and added tests to verify the new patch extension functionality.
  • Revised documentation to reflect the new configuration options for patch extension.
  • Enabled extra lines for code suggestions by default.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Configuration changes
__init__.py
Add Claude 3.5 Sonnet model                                                           

pr_agent/algo/init.py

  • Added 'claude-3-5-sonnet' to the model token limit dictionary with a
    limit of 100000 tokens.
  • +1/-0     
    configuration.toml
    Update configuration for new patch extension settings       

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

  • Changed patch_extra_lines to separate patch_extra_lines_before and
    patch_extra_lines_after.
  • Updated patch_extra_lines_before to 4 and patch_extra_lines_after to
    2.
  • Increased max_context_tokens from 10000 to 16000.
  • +3/-2     
    Enhancement
    git_patch_processing.py
    Refactor patch extension for granular context control       

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Modified extend_patch function to accept separate
    patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after parameters.
  • Updated patch extension logic to use these new parameters for more
    granular control over context lines.
  • +8/-19   
    pr_processing.py
    Update PR processing for new patch extension parameters   

    pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

  • Updated get_pr_diff and pr_generate_extended_diff functions to use
    separate before and after extra lines parameters.
  • Modified patch extension calls to use the new configuration settings.
  • +15/-17 
    pr_code_suggestions.py
    Enable extra lines for code suggestions                                   

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

  • Changed disable_extra_lines parameter from True to False in the
    get_pr_diff call within _prepare_prediction method.
  • +1/-1     
    Tests
    test_extend_patch.py
    Update and add tests for new patch extension functionality

    tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py

  • Updated existing tests to use new patch_extra_lines_before and
    patch_extra_lines_after parameters.
  • Added new test class PRProcessingTest with tests for extended patch
    functionality.
  • +65/-45 
    Documentation
    additional_configurations.md
    Update documentation for new patch extension settings       

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md

  • Updated documentation to reflect new patch_extra_lines_before and
    patch_extra_lines_after configuration options.
  • +2/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    mrT23 added 2 commits August 10, 2024 21:55
    …s handling
    
    - Added unit tests in `test_extend_patch.py` and `test_pr_generate_extended_diff.py` to verify patch extension functionality with extra lines.
    - Updated `pr_processing.py` to include `patch_extra_lines_before` and `patch_extra_lines_after` settings.
    - Modified `configuration.toml` to adjust `patch_extra_lines_before` to 4 and `max_context_tokens` to 16000.
    - Enabled extra lines in `pr_code_suggestions.py`.
    - Added new model `claude-3-5-sonnet` to `__init__.py`.
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Implement granular control over patch extension

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py
    • pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

    Sub-PR theme: Update configuration and documentation for new patch extension parameters

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml
    • docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md

    Sub-PR theme: Add and update tests for new patch extension functionality

    Relevant files:

    • tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py

    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Code Refactoring
    The extend_patch function has been significantly modified to handle separate patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after parameters. This change might require careful review to ensure it doesn't introduce any bugs.

    Configuration Update
    The PR introduces new configuration parameters patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after. Ensure these are properly documented and used consistently throughout the codebase.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Use parameterized tests to reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability

    Consider using parameterized tests to reduce code duplication and make it easier to
    add new test cases. This will make the test suite more maintainable and easier to
    extend.

    tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py [6-25]

    -def test_happy_path(self):
    -    original_file_str = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5'
    -    patch_str = '@@ -2,2 +2,2 @@ init()\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3'
    -    num_lines = 1
    -    expected_output = '@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ init()\nline1\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3\nline4'
    +import pytest
    +
    +@pytest.mark.parametrize("original_file_str, patch_str, num_lines, expected_output", [
    +    ('line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5',
    +     '@@ -2,2 +2,2 @@ init()\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3',
    +     1,
    +     '@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ init()\nline1\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3\nline4'),
    +    ('line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5',
    +     '',
    +     1,
    +     ''),
    +])
    +def test_extend_patch(self, original_file_str, patch_str, num_lines, expected_output):
         actual_output = extend_patch(original_file_str, patch_str,
                                      patch_extra_lines_before=num_lines, patch_extra_lines_after=num_lines)
         assert actual_output == expected_output
     
    -# Tests that the function returns an empty string when patch_str is empty
    -def test_empty_patch(self):
    -    original_file_str = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5'
    -    patch_str = ''
    -    num_lines = 1
    -    expected_output = ''
    -    assert extend_patch(original_file_str, patch_str,
    -                        patch_extra_lines_before=num_lines, patch_extra_lines_after=num_lines) == expected_output
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Parameterized tests significantly improve test maintainability and make it easier to add new test cases, which is a valuable best practice in testing.

    8
    Maintainability
    Extract patch extension logic into a separate function for better modularity

    Consider extracting the patch extension logic into a separate function to improve
    code modularity and reusability. This will make the code easier to maintain and
    test.

    pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py [404-407]

    +def get_patch_extension_params():
    +    settings = get_settings()
    +    return {
    +        'patch_extra_lines_before': settings.config.patch_extra_lines_before,
    +        'patch_extra_lines_after': settings.config.patch_extra_lines_after
    +    }
    +
    +patch_params = get_patch_extension_params()
     patches_extended, total_tokens, patches_extended_tokens = pr_generate_extended_diff(
    -    pr_languages, token_handler, add_line_numbers_to_hunks=True,
    -    patch_extra_lines_before=get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_before,
    -    patch_extra_lines_after=get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_after)
    +    pr_languages, token_handler, add_line_numbers_to_hunks=True, **patch_params)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion improves code modularity and reusability, which can lead to better maintainability and easier testing.

    7
    Use a more descriptive variable name to improve code readability

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of res to improve code
    readability. For example, you could use hunk_info or patch_details to better reflect
    the content of the list.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [37-46]

    -res = list(match.groups())
    -for i in range(len(res)):
    -    if res[i] is not None:
    -        res[i] = res[i].decode('utf-8')
    -start1, size1, size2 = map(int, res[:3])
    +hunk_info = list(match.groups())
    +for i in range(len(hunk_info)):
    +    if hunk_info[i] is not None:
    +        hunk_info[i] = hunk_info[i].decode('utf-8')
    +start1, size1, size2 = map(int, hunk_info[:3])
     start2 = 0
    -section_header = res[4]
    +section_header = hunk_info[4]
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability by using a more descriptive variable name, but it's a minor change that doesn't significantly impact functionality.

    5
    Enhancement
    Use f-strings for more concise and readable string formatting

    Consider using f-strings for string formatting instead of the older .format()
    method. F-strings are more readable and generally faster.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [51-53]

     extended_patch_lines.append(
    -    f'@@ -{extended_start1},{extended_size1} '
    -    f'+{extended_start2},{extended_size2} @@ {section_header}')
    +    f'@@ -{extended_start1},{extended_size1} +{extended_start2},{extended_size2} @@ {section_header}')
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

    Why: While f-strings can improve readability, the existing code is already using f-strings. The suggestion only combines two f-strings into one, which is a minor optimization.

    4

    @mrT23 mrT23 closed this Aug 11, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant