You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The action failed due to a network issue when trying to pull the Docker image for buildkit:
The Docker buildx command attempted to pull the image moby/buildkit:buildx-stable-1
The Docker registry (registry-1.docker.io) responded with a 502 Bad Gateway error
This indicates a temporary network or server issue on Docker Hub's side
As a result, the Docker buildx process was unable to create and bootstrap the builder, causing the action to fail
Relevant error logs:
1: ##[group]Operating System2: Ubuntu
...
530: [command]/usr/bin/docker buildx create --name builder-70214f0d-12fe-4369-bfa1-941fceff6ae5 --driver docker-container --buildkitd-flags --allow-insecure-entitlement security.insecure --allow-insecure-entitlement network.host --use531: builder-70214f0d-12fe-4369-bfa1-941fceff6ae5532: ##[endgroup]533: ##[group]Booting builder534: [command]/usr/bin/docker buildx inspect --bootstrap --builder builder-70214f0d-12fe-4369-bfa1-941fceff6ae5535: #1 [internal] booting buildkit536: #1 pulling image moby/buildkit:buildx-stable-1537: #1 pulling image moby/buildkit:buildx-stable-1 10.4s done538: #1 ERROR: Error response from daemon: Head "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/moby/buildkit/manifests/buildx-stable-1": received unexpected HTTP status: 502 Bad Gateway539: ------540: > [internal] booting buildkit:541: ------542: ERROR: Error response from daemon: Head "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/moby/buildkit/manifests/buildx-stable-1": received unexpected HTTP status: 502 Bad Gateway543: ##[endgroup]544: ##[error]The process '/usr/bin/docker' failed with exit code 1
✨ CI feedback usage guide:
The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:
Failed stage
Failed test name
Failure summary
Relevant error logs
In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:
where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.
Configuration options
enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.
See more information about the checks tool in the docs.
Use specific exception handling for JSON parsing and key retrieval
Consider using a more specific exception type instead of a bare except clause. This will help catch only the expected exceptions and allow other unexpected exceptions to propagate.
try:
secret_dict = json.loads(secret)
gitlab_token = secret_dict["gitlab_token"]
+except (json.JSONDecodeError, KeyError) as e:+ get_logger().error(f"Failed to parse secret or retrieve gitlab_token: {e}")+ return JSONResponse(status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED,+ content=jsonable_encoder({"message": "unauthorized"}))
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion enhances error handling by catching specific exceptions, which is a best practice in Python and improves code robustness.
8
Enhancement
Return None instead of an empty string when failing to retrieve a secret
Consider returning None instead of an empty string when failing to retrieve a secret. This allows the caller to distinguish between a non-existent secret and an empty secret, potentially preventing silent failures.
except Exception as e:
get_logger().warning(f"Failed to get secret {secret_name} from Google Cloud Storage: {e}")
- return ""+ return None
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: This suggestion improves error handling by allowing callers to distinguish between non-existent and empty secrets, potentially preventing silent failures.
7
Maintainability
Refactor nested if-else statements to reduce complexity and improve readability
Consider refactoring the nested if-else statements into separate functions or using early returns to reduce nesting and improve readability.
-if file.head_file:- file_lines = file.head_file.splitlines()- if relevant_lines_start > len(file_lines):- get_logger().warning(- "Could not dedent code snippet, because relevant_lines_start is out of range",- artifact={'filename': file.filename,- 'file_content': file.head_file,- 'relevant_lines_start': relevant_lines_start,- 'new_code_snippet': new_code_snippet})- return new_code_snippet- else:- original_initial_line = file_lines[relevant_lines_start - 1]-else:+if not file.head_file:
get_logger().warning("Could not dedent code snippet, because head_file is missing",
artifact={'filename': file.filename,
'relevant_lines_start': relevant_lines_start,
'new_code_snippet': new_code_snippet})
return new_code_snippet
+file_lines = file.head_file.splitlines()+if relevant_lines_start > len(file_lines):+ get_logger().warning(+ "Could not dedent code snippet, because relevant_lines_start is out of range",+ artifact={'filename': file.filename,+ 'file_content': file.head_file,+ 'relevant_lines_start': relevant_lines_start,+ 'new_code_snippet': new_code_snippet})+ return new_code_snippet++original_initial_line = file_lines[relevant_lines_start - 1]+
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: The suggestion improves code readability and maintainability by reducing nesting and complexity, which is beneficial for long-term code management.
7
Performance
Use a set for required fields and improve efficiency of the membership check
Consider using a set for required_fields instead of a list for more efficient membership testing. Also, use the all() function with a generator expression for a more concise and potentially more efficient check.
-required_fields = ['changes_summary', 'changes_title', 'filename', 'label']-if not all(field in file for field in required_fields):+required_fields = {'changes_summary', 'changes_title', 'filename', 'label'}+if not required_fields.issubset(file):
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: This suggestion offers a minor performance improvement by using a set for more efficient membership testing, though the impact may be minimal for small collections.
✅ Correct the condition for checking if relevant_lines_start is out of rangeSuggestion Impact:The suggestion corrected the logic error in the condition by changing the comparison from `>=` to `>`, which aligns with the intention of the suggestion.
code diff:
- if len(file_lines) >= relevant_lines_start:+ if relevant_lines_start > len(file_lines):
The condition in the if statement is incorrect. It should check if the length of file_lines is less than relevant_lines_start, not greater than or equal to.
-if len(file_lines) >= relevant_lines_start:+if len(file_lines) < relevant_lines_start:
get_logger().warning(
"Could not dedent code snippet, because relevant_lines_start is out of range",
artifact={'filename': file.filename,
'file_content': file.head_file,
'relevant_lines_start': relevant_lines_start,
'new_code_snippet': new_code_snippet})
return new_code_snippet
else:
original_initial_line = file_lines[relevant_lines_start - 1]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10
Why: This suggestion corrects a critical logic error that could lead to incorrect behavior or exceptions. The current condition is reversed, which is a significant bug.
10
Enhancement
Return None instead of an empty string when failing to retrieve a secret
Consider returning None instead of an empty string when failing to retrieve a secret. This allows the caller to distinguish between a non-existent secret and an empty secret value.
try:
blob = self.bucket.blob(secret_name)
return blob.download_as_string()
except Exception as e:
get_logger().warning(f"Failed to get secret {secret_name} from Google Cloud Storage: {e}")
- return ""+ return None
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: The suggestion improves error handling by distinguishing between non-existent secrets and empty values, which can be beneficial for debugging and error handling in the calling code.
7
Performance
Use a set instead of a list for required fields to improve lookup performance
Consider using a set instead of a list for required_fields to improve lookup performance, especially if this check is performed frequently.
-required_fields = ['changes_summary', 'changes_title', 'filename', 'label']-if not all(field in file for field in required_fields):+required_fields = {'changes_summary', 'changes_title', 'filename', 'label'}+if not required_fields.issubset(file.keys()):
# can happen for example if a YAML generation was interrupted in the middle (no more tokens)
get_logger().warning(f"Missing required fields in file label dict {self.pr_id}, skipping file",
artifact={"file": file})
continue
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: While using a set can provide a minor performance improvement for lookups, the impact is likely negligible in this context. The suggestion is correct but not crucial for the functionality.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement, Bug fix
Description
relevant_lines_startand missinghead_filein code suggestionsgit_filesattributeChanges walkthrough 📝
bitbucket_provider.py
Add git_files attribute to Bitbucket providerpr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
git_filesattribute to the Bitbucket provider classgoogle_cloud_storage_secret_provider.py
Adjust log level for GCS secret retrievalpr_agent/secret_providers/google_cloud_storage_secret_provider.py
gitlab_webhook.py
Improve error handling for GitLab webhookpr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py
pr_code_suggestions.py
Enhance error handling in code suggestionspr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py
relevant_lines_starthead_filepr_description.py
Improve error handling in PR descriptionpr_agent/tools/pr_description.py
dictionary