Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'only_markdown' parameter to emphasize_header call in utils.py fo… #1138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 14, 2024

User description

…r security concerns section


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Added only_markdown=True parameter to emphasize_header() function call in the convert_to_markdown_v2() function
  • This change specifically targets the security concerns section of the output
  • The modification ensures that the security concerns are properly formatted and emphasized in Markdown
  • Improves the readability and presentation of security-related information in the generated Markdown output

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
utils.py
Enhance security concerns formatting in Markdown conversion

pr_agent/algo/utils.py

  • Added only_markdown=True parameter to emphasize_header() function call
    for security concerns section
  • +1/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 95
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 No multiple PR themes
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Add a default value for a new parameter to maintain backwards compatibility

    Consider adding a default value for the only_markdown parameter in the
    emphasize_header function call to maintain backwards compatibility.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [178]

    -value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True)
    +value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True if 'only_markdown' in emphasize_header.__code__.co_varnames else False)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion addresses a potential backwards compatibility issue, which is important for maintaining the stability of the codebase.

    8
    Possible issue
    Add error handling for a function call with a new parameter

    Consider adding error handling around the emphasize_header function call in case it
    raises an exception with the new parameter.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [178]

    -value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True)
    +try:
    +    value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True)
    +except TypeError as e:
    +    logging.warning(f"Error in emphasize_header: {e}")
    +    value = value.strip()
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Error handling is important for robustness, especially when introducing new parameters, but it's not addressing a confirmed issue in the current code.

    7
    Maintainability
    Use a constant instead of a hardcoded boolean value

    Consider using a constant or configuration variable for the only_markdown parameter
    value instead of hardcoding it.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [178]

    -value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=True)
    +value = emphasize_header(value.strip(), only_markdown=MARKDOWN_ONLY)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While using a constant can improve maintainability, it's a minor improvement that doesn't address a critical issue.

    5

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit b9df034 into main Aug 14, 2024
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/err_protections branch August 14, 2024 11:03
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants