You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Introduce traceback logging for exceptions during notification processing.
- Enhance logging for PR comments with additional artifact information.
- Update configuration settings for publishing PR descriptions as comments.
Sub-PR theme: Refactor comment handling and improve GitHub provider
Relevant files:
pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py
pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py
pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
Sub-PR theme: Enhance error handling and logging across multiple components
Relevant files:
pr_agent/servers/github_polling.py
pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py
pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py
pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
⚡ Key issues to review
Performance Optimization The limit_output_characters call has been moved before the API requests in the edit_comment_from_comment_id and reply_to_comment_from_comment_id methods. This change improves efficiency by limiting the character count before making the API call.
Error Handling The log level for failed eyes reaction has been changed from error to warning. This might lead to overlooking potential issues if not monitored properly.
Error Logging Enhanced error logging has been added, including traceback information. This provides more detailed information for debugging but might expose sensitive information if not handled carefully.
Use more specific exception types for better error handling and debugging
Consider using a more specific exception type instead of the generic Exception to catch and handle errors more precisely. This will make the error handling more robust and easier to maintain.
+except (aiohttp.ClientError, asyncio.TimeoutError) as e:+ get_logger().error(f"Network error during processing of a notification: {e}",+ artifact={"traceback": traceback.format_exc()})+except json.JSONDecodeError as e:+ get_logger().error(f"JSON parsing error during processing of a notification: {e}",+ artifact={"traceback": traceback.format_exc()})
except Exception as e:
- get_logger().error(f"Polling exception during processing of a notification: {e}",+ get_logger().error(f"Unexpected error during processing of a notification: {e}",
artifact={"traceback": traceback.format_exc()})
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion significantly improves error handling, which is crucial for robust and maintainable code.
8
Add more specific exception handling for better error reporting and debugging
Consider adding more specific error handling for different types of exceptions that might occur when preparing the prediction. This will provide more detailed error information and make debugging easier.
async def run(self) -> None:
try:
if not self.git_provider.get_files():
get_logger().info(f"PR has no files: {self.pr_url}, skipping review")
return None
if self.incremental.is_incremental and not self._can_run_incremental_review():
return None
if isinstance(self.args, list) and self.args and self.args[0] == 'auto_approve':
+ except self.git_provider.ApiError as e:+ get_logger().error(f"API error while fetching PR files: {e}")+ except ValueError as e:+ get_logger().error(f"Value error in PR review process: {e}")+ except Exception as e:+ get_logger().error(f"Unexpected error in PR review process: {e}")+ get_logger().debug(traceback.format_exc())
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion greatly improves error handling and debugging capabilities, which is important for code reliability.
8
Maintainability
Refactor the character limit logic into a separate method to reduce code duplication
Consider moving the self.limit_output_characters(body, self.max_comment_chars) call to a separate method to avoid code duplication. This will improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
Why: The suggestion improves code maintainability by reducing duplication, but it's not addressing a critical issue.
7
Best practice
✅ Use a constant for the maximum number of previous comments instead of hardcoding the value
Consider using a constant or configuration variable for the maximum number of previous comments instead of hardcoding the value 4. This will make the code more flexible and easier to maintain.
+MAX_PREVIOUS_COMMENTS = 4 # Define this at the top of the file or in a config+
def publish_persistent_comment_with_history(self, pr_comment: str,
initial_header: str,
update_header: bool = True,
name='review',
final_update_message=True,
- max_previous_comments=4,+ max_previous_comments=MAX_PREVIOUS_COMMENTS,
progress_response=None):
[Suggestion has been applied]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: While this improves maintainability, it's a minor change that doesn't significantly impact functionality.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement, Documentation
Description
limit_output_characters
call before API requestslimit_output_characters
call for file commentsdelete_comment
method from Azure DevOps provider and abstract base classremove_comment
insteadpublish_description_as_comment
to True in GitHub polling serverChanges walkthrough 📝
azuredevops_provider.py
Remove delete_comment method
pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py
delete_comment
methodgit_provider.py
Remove delete_comment from base class
pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py
delete_comment
method from abstract base classgithub_provider.py
Optimize comment handling and logging
pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
limit_output_characters
call before API requestslimit_output_characters
call for file commentsgithub_polling.py
Improve logging and error handling
pr_agent/servers/github_polling.py
pr_code_suggestions.py
Add logging and update comment handling
pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py
delete_comment
toremove_comment
pr_reviewer.py
Improve logging for PR review edge cases
pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
pr_description.py
Enhance error handling in file label preparation
pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py
method