Tr/updates

[mrT23]

PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement

---

Description

This PR includes several improvements and bug fixes across multiple files:

• Enhanced git patch processing to correctly handle non-empty lines
• Improved Bitbucket provider robustness:
  • Added fallback encodings for PR patch decoding
  • Enhanced error handling and logging for diff retrieval
  • Ensured full files are retrieved in get_diff_files method
• Fixed handling of missing score in code suggestions
• General code cleanup and formatting improvements

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	git_patch_processing.py Enhance git patch processing for non-empty lines                  pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py Added a check for non-empty lines in the omit_deletion_hunks function Improved handling of edit types for non-empty lines +4/-3      pr_code_suggestions.py Handle missing score in code suggestions                                  pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py Added fallback for missing score in code suggestions Fixed indentation issues +3/-3
Enhancement	bitbucket_provider.py Improve Bitbucket provider robustness and code quality      pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py Improved PR patch decoding with fallback encodings Enhanced error handling and logging for diff retrieval Cleaned up code formatting and removed unnecessary blank lines Ensured full files are retrieved in get_diff_files method +34/-17

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

🔀 Multiple PR themes Sub-PR theme: Enhance git patch processing for non-empty lines Relevant files: pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py Sub-PR theme: Improve Bitbucket provider robustness and error handling Relevant files: pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py Sub-PR theme: Fix handling of missing score in code suggestions Relevant files: pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

⚡ Key issues to review Possible Bug The new check for non-empty lines might introduce unexpected behavior if there are empty lines in the patch. Consider handling empty lines explicitly. Error Handling The error handling for PR patch decoding could be improved. Consider using a more generic approach to handle different encodings. Code Smell The condition for checking if code suggestions exist is complex and hard to read. Consider simplifying or extracting it into a separate function.

[hussam789]

@CodiumAI-Agent /improve
--pr_code_suggestions.num_code_suggestions_per_chunk="8"

[coditamar]

/improve
--pr_code_suggestions.num_code_suggestions_per_chunk="4"
--pr_code_suggestions.suggestions_score_threshold="6"

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 9e063bf

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Provide a default value when accessing dictionary keys to prevent potential errors Consider adding a default value for the 'score' key when using the get() method to avoid potential KeyError if the key is missing. pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [530-535] +if get_settings().pr_code_suggestions.self_reflect_on_suggestions: + score = int(prediction.get("score", 1)) + if score >= score_threshold: + data["code_suggestions"].append(prediction) + else: + get_logger().info( - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue and provides a solution that improves code robustness by preventing KeyError exceptions.	8
Enhancement	Use a more descriptive variable name for better code readability Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of edit_type. For example, line_prefix would better describe what the variable represents. pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [167-170] if line: - edit_type = line[0] - if edit_type == '+': + line_prefix = line[0] + if line_prefix == '+': add_hunk = True Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to use 'line_prefix' instead of 'edit_type' is valid and improves code readability, but it's a minor enhancement.	6

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 9e063bf

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use a more specific exception type for better error handling Consider using a more specific exception type instead of a bare except clause. This will help in catching and handling specific errors more effectively. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [166-170] try: pr_patches = self.pr.diff() -except Exception as e: +except UnicodeDecodeError as e: # Try different encodings if UTF-8 fails get_logger().warning(f"Failed to decode PR patch with utf-8, error: {e}") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Using a specific exception type (UnicodeDecodeError) improves error handling and makes the code more robust and maintainable.	7
	Use the get() method with a default value for safer dictionary access Consider using the get() method with a default value instead of checking if the key exists in the dictionary. This can make the code more concise and avoid potential KeyError exceptions. pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [107-108] -if (data is None or 'code_suggestions' not in data or not data['code_suggestions'] +if (data is None or not data.get('code_suggestions', []) and get_settings().config.publish_output): Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves code safety by using the get() method with a default value, reducing the risk of KeyError exceptions.	7
	Use the setdefault() method for safer dictionary access and modification Consider using the get() method with a default value instead of accessing the dictionary key directly. This can make the code more robust by avoiding potential KeyError exceptions. pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [530-533] if get_settings().pr_code_suggestions.self_reflect_on_suggestions: score = int(prediction.get("score", 1)) if score >= score_threshold: - data["code_suggestions"].append(prediction) + data.setdefault("code_suggestions", []).append(prediction) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion improves code safety by using setdefault(), but the original code was already using get() method, so the improvement is minor.	6
Enhancement	Simplify list filtering using a list comprehension with enumeration Consider using a list comprehension instead of a for loop to create the diff_split list. This can make the code more concise and potentially more efficient. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [184-187] diff_split = ["diff --git" + x for x in pr_patches.split("diff --git") if x.strip()] # filter all elements of 'diff_split' that are of indices in 'diffs_original' that are not in 'diffs' if len(diff_split) > len(diffs) and len(diffs_original) == len(diff_split): - diff_split = [diff_split[i] for i in range(len(diff_split)) if diffs_original[i] in diffs] + diff_split = [d for i, d in enumerate(diff_split) if diffs_original[i] in diffs] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion improves code readability and potentially efficiency by using a more concise list comprehension, but the performance gain is likely minimal.	6
	Use a dictionary comprehension to create the headers dictionary Consider using a dictionary comprehension instead of a for loop to create the files dictionary. This can make the code more concise and potentially more efficient. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [493-498] files = {file_path: contents} data = { "message": message, "branch": branch } +headers = {k: v for k, v in self.headers.items() if k == 'Authorization'} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion improves code conciseness by using a dictionary comprehension, but it's a minor optimization with little impact on overall performance.	6
Performance	Optimize the condition check for non-empty lines and addition markers Consider moving the if line: check outside the loop to avoid unnecessary checks for empty lines. This can slightly improve performance, especially for large diffs. pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [165-170] else: temp_hunk.append(line) - if line: - edit_type = line[0] - if edit_type == '+': - add_hunk = True + if line and line[0] == '+': + add_hunk = True Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion improves code readability and slightly optimizes performance by combining conditions, but the improvement is minor.	5