Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: enhance ticket compliance analysis with human verification tracking #1486

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

hussam789
Copy link
Collaborator

@hussam789 hussam789 commented Jan 26, 2025

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation


Description

  • Enhanced ticket compliance logic with human verification tracking.

  • Improved compliance level aggregation and emoji representation.

  • Updated documentation for ticket compliance fields in prompts.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
utils.py
Enhance ticket compliance logic and markdown generation   

pr_agent/algo/utils.py

  • Added tracking for human verification in ticket compliance.
  • Enhanced compliance level aggregation logic and emoji representation.
  • Improved error handling and logging for ticket compliance processing.
  • Updated markdown generation for compliance analysis.
  • +85/-34 
    Documentation
    pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    Update ticket compliance field documentation                         

    pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

  • Updated field descriptions for ticket compliance.
  • Added a new field for human verification requirements.
  • Improved clarity and detail in compliance-related documentation.
  • +4/-4     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • feat: enhance ticket compliance analysis with human verification tracking
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling

    The ticket compliance processing has broad exception handling that may hide specific issues. Consider adding more granular error handling and logging specific error types.

    except Exception as e:
        get_logger().exception(f"Failed to process ticket compliance: {e}")
        continue
    Code Complexity

    The compliance level calculation logic has multiple nested conditions that could be simplified or extracted into a separate function for better maintainability.

    if all_compliance_levels:
        if all(level == 'Fully compliant' for level in all_compliance_levels):
            compliance_level = 'Fully compliant'
            compliance_emoji = '✅'
        elif all(level == 'PR Code Verified' for level in all_compliance_levels):
            compliance_level = 'PR Code Verified'
            compliance_emoji = '✅'
        elif any(level == 'Not compliant' for level in all_compliance_levels):
            # If there's a mix of compliant and non-compliant tickets
            if any(level in ['Fully compliant', 'PR Code Verified'] for level in all_compliance_levels):
                compliance_level = 'Partially compliant'
                compliance_emoji = '🔶'
            else:
                compliance_level = 'Not compliant'
                compliance_emoji = '❌'
        elif any(level == 'Partially compliant' for level in all_compliance_levels):
            compliance_level = 'Partially compliant'
            compliance_emoji = '🔶'
        else:
            compliance_level = 'PR Code Verified'
            compliance_emoji = '✅'

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Handle invalid ticket URL safely

    Add error handling for empty or invalid ticket_url to prevent potential runtime
    errors when accessing the URL's last segment.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [326-362]

     ticket_url = ticket_analysis.get('ticket_url', '').strip()
    -...
    -ticket_compliance_str += f"\n\n**[{ticket_url.split('/')[-1]}]({ticket_url}) - {ticket_compliance_level}**\n\n{explanation}\n\n"
    +if not ticket_url:
    +    get_logger().warning("Empty ticket URL found in compliance analysis")
    +    continue
    +ticket_id = ticket_url.split('/')[-1] if '/' in ticket_url else ticket_url
    +ticket_compliance_str += f"\n\n**[{ticket_id}]({ticket_url}) - {ticket_compliance_level}**\n\n{explanation}\n\n"
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion addresses a potential runtime error that could occur when processing invalid ticket URLs. Adding proper validation and error handling for empty URLs improves the code's robustness and prevents crashes.

    8
    Validate variable before statistics update

    Add validation for compliance_level before setting it in extra_statistics to prevent
    potential undefined variable reference.

    pr_agent/algo/utils.py [399]

    -get_settings().set('config.extra_statistics', {'compliance_level': compliance_level})
    +if 'compliance_level' in locals():
    +    get_settings().set('config.extra_statistics', {'compliance_level': compliance_level})
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion prevents a potential NameError by checking if the compliance_level variable exists before using it. This is important as the variable might not be defined if the code execution doesn't reach the compliance level calculation.

    7

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit beffa8d into main Jan 26, 2025
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the hl/update_ticket_analysis branch January 26, 2025 13:58
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants