-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve ingest lock #5296
Open
trinity-1686a
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
trinity/improve-ingest-lock
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
improve ingest lock #5296
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
740d0f2
improve ingest lock
trinity-1686a 88d5ac3
Merge branch 'main' into trinity/improve-ingest-lock
trinity-1686a 748fbd2
make lock metrics not do dynamic lookups
trinity-1686a aa8fbff
Merge branch 'main' into trinity/improve-ingest-lock
trinity-1686a File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one of the sad things with relying on dynamic labels like this, is that you end up doing one hashmap lookup very time you need to access the counter (here once per lock).
It is probably not catastrophic in this case, but here is the alternative.
have a histogram: directly on the
TimedMutexGuard
You can then cache the Histogram counter in different ways. In ingest v2 you can see the pattern done here. The value are stored in the metrics.rs directly. https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit/blob/main/quickwit/quickwit-ingest/src/ingest_v2/metrics.rs#L59-L74.
You could also cache it closer to the usage site if you prefer.
I kind of like to keep the MetricsVec definition in metrics.rs, because it really helps to maintain some consistency in the naming/help etc. and it makes it easier to search for the relevant metrics name...
But it is less critical for metrics labels...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i like this pattern of statically defining things, however it's a kind of a pain, and a large typo hazard to implement. Having some sort of macro to derive "Build a static (histogram|gauge|counter) vec from a dynamic vec" would be nice, and would likely make us use this more