-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix existence queries for nested fields #5581
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
expected: | ||
hits: | ||
total: | ||
# one of the docs contains `"payload":{}` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you run this test against elasticsearch too locally?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in particular is {}
considered not having the value? Is this true in elastic and in quickwit? Both for fast field and indexed field path?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I ran this test against Elastic. That's how I got the 99 value and discovered that there is a {}
and that it is considered has not having a value in Elastic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thnk you are the first dev to actually run those tests against elastic too :) thx
2efa1ed
to
b986963
Compare
b986963
to
749f03b
Compare
Description
Closes #5560
How was this PR tested?
Describe how you tested this PR.