Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat : handle transactions effectively #396

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rajadilipkolli
Copy link
Owner

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli commented Aug 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced caching and transaction management across several services to improve performance and ensure read-only operations.
    • Introduced new architectural rules for validating service annotations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved transaction management behavior in service methods to prevent unintended data modifications.
  • Documentation

    • Updated licensing comments to reflect the new licensing period from 2022 to 2024.

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli self-assigned this Aug 10, 2024
@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli linked an issue Aug 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the transaction management and caching strategies across various service classes in the application. Several methods are now clearly defined as read-only, improving performance and ensuring data integrity. Additionally, new conditions and architectural rules have been established to enforce these practices throughout the codebase, fostering a more robust framework for managing transactions.

Changes

Files Changed Change Summary
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/repository/UserSchemeDetailsEntityRepository.java Removed @Transactional(readOnly = true) from three methods, allowing for potential write operations.
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/* (including CachedNavService.java, CapitalGainsService.java, etc.) Added @Transactional(readOnly = true) to multiple service classes, indicating read-only operations.
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/MFSchemeNavService.java Introduced a TransactionTemplate for enhanced transaction management in the constructor.
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java Updated class-level @Transactional to read-only and modified saveEntity method to REQUIRES_NEW.
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserFolioDetailsService.java Changed updatePanByCasId method to @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW).
src/test/java/com/learning/mfscreener/archunit/* Updated architectural rules in ServiceRulesTest to enforce @Transactional(readOnly = true) on services.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Service
    participant Repository

    User->>Service: Request Data
    Service->>Repository: Fetch Data
    Repository-->>Service: Return Data
    Service-->>User: Provide Data
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, we hop and play,
With code refined in a new way.
Transactions clear, the data flows,
A rabbit's joy in the fields it sows!
Each service dances, read-only's cheer,
Hopping forward, no worries here! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/HistoricalNavService.java (1)

31-31: Review read-only transaction annotation usage

The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation in the HistoricalNavService class is not suitable because the class contains methods that perform write operations to the database, such as schemeService.saveEntity. Consider revising the transaction management strategy to accommodate these operations.

  • Method containing write operation: schemeService.saveEntity(mfSchemeEntity)
Analysis chain

Verify read-only transaction suitability.

The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation has been added to the class. Ensure that all methods in this class do not perform any write operations to the database, as this annotation is intended for read-only operations.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if any methods in HistoricalNavService perform write operations.

# Test: Search for potential write operations within the class. Expect: No write operations.
rg --type java -A 5 $'(insert|update|delete|save|persist)' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/HistoricalNavService.java

Length of output: 2380

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java (1)

157-157: Consider extending exception handling in mergeList.

The mergeList method currently handles ConstraintViolationException and DataIntegrityViolationException, which is a good start. However, consider reviewing the transaction handling to ensure all potential exceptions are covered, such as general SQL exceptions or other runtime exceptions, to prevent unhandled exceptions from affecting application stability.

  • Review exception handling in the mergeList method for completeness.
Analysis chain

Review transaction handling in mergeList.

The use of transactionTemplate.executeWithoutResult provides better transaction management. Ensure that error handling is robust and that all potential exceptions are considered.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in transaction management.

# Test: Check for comprehensive exception handling in transaction-related code.
rg --type java 'try|catch|throw' -A 5 src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java

Length of output: 1318

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/FIFOUnitsService.java (1)

29-29: Conflict with @transactional(readOnly = true) Detected

The FIFOUnitsService class contains methods that likely perform write operations, such as buy and sell, which conflict with the @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation applied at the class level. Consider reviewing these methods to ensure they align with the read-only transactional context or adjust the transactional settings accordingly.

  • Methods: buy, sell
Analysis chain

Ensure all methods are read-only.

The addition of @Transactional(readOnly = true) at the class level optimizes performance for read operations. Verify that no methods perform write operations, as this would conflict with the read-only setting.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that no methods in FIFOUnitsService perform write operations.

# Test: Search for methods that might perform write operations.
rg --type java 'save|insert|update|delete' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/FIFOUnitsService.java

Length of output: 112


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify method calls in FIFOUnitsService that might lead to write operations.

# Test: Search for method calls in FIFOUnitsService that might indicate write operations.
rg --type java '\.\w+\(' -A 3 src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/FIFOUnitsService.java

Length of output: 9566

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61be2ca and 41cec39.

Files selected for processing (16)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/repository/UserSchemeDetailsEntityRepository.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CachedNavService.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/FIFOUnitsService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/GainEntryService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/HistoricalNavService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/MFSchemeNavService.java (3 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/NavService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/PortfolioService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/PortfolioServiceHelper.java (3 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java (7 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserCASDetailsService.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserFolioDetailsService.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/XIRRCalculatorService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/com/learning/mfscreener/archunit/CustomConditions.java (3 hunks)
  • src/test/java/com/learning/mfscreener/archunit/ServiceRulesTest.java (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (24)
src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserCASDetailsService.java (1)

24-24: Verify the impact of Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW.

The saveEntity method now starts a new transaction for each call. Ensure that this change does not lead to unintended side effects, such as increased resource usage or conflicts with existing transaction management strategies.

Verification successful

Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW in saveEntity Method

The use of Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW in the saveEntity method of UserCASDetailsService ensures that it operates in a separate transaction, even when called from a read-only transactional context like PortfolioService. This is intentional and helps maintain data integrity. However, monitor for increased resource usage due to multiple transactions.

  • PortfolioService: Annotated with @Transactional(readOnly = true), ensuring saveEntity runs in its own transaction.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the `Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW` on the `saveEntity` method.

# Test: Search for all calls to `saveEntity`. Expect: Review their transactional context.
rg --type java -A 5 $'saveEntity'

Length of output: 2861


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for @Transactional annotations in classes and methods that call saveEntity
rg --type java '@Transactional' -A 3

Length of output: 16854

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserFolioDetailsService.java (1)

37-37: Verify the impact of Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW.

The updatePanByCasId method now starts a new transaction for each call. Ensure that this change does not lead to unintended side effects, such as increased resource usage or conflicts with existing transaction management strategies.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/repository/UserSchemeDetailsEntityRepository.java (1)

Line range hint 19-19:
Verify the rationale for removing @Transactional(readOnly = true).

The removal of the readOnly attribute from these methods could impact their performance and intended use. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall transaction management strategy and does not introduce unintended side effects.

Also applies to: 27-27, 30-30

Verification successful

Verification Successful: The removal of @Transactional(readOnly = true) from repository methods aligns with the transaction management strategy. The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation is applied at the service class level, ensuring that the read-only transactional behavior is preserved. This change does not introduce unintended side effects.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the rationale and impact of removing `@Transactional(readOnly = true)`.

# Test: Search for all usages of the affected methods. Expect: Review their transactional context and usage.
rg --type java -A 5 $'(findByUserEmailAndName|findFirstByAmfi|getHistoricalDataNotLoadedSchemeIdList)'

Length of output: 6166


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for @Transactional annotations in the service classes that use the affected repository methods.
rg --type java '@Transactional' -A 5 src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserFolioDetailsService.java src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/UserSchemeDetailsService.java src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/PortfolioService.java

Length of output: 4503

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CachedNavService.java (2)

15-15: Good use of @Transactional(readOnly = true).

Applying this annotation at the class level ensures all methods are treated as read-only transactions, which can enhance performance and prevent unintended data modifications.


27-31: Enhanced cache key strategy.

The updated @Cacheable annotation with a detailed key generation strategy improves cache management by creating unique cache entries for different inputs, reducing cache collisions.

src/test/java/com/learning/mfscreener/archunit/ServiceRulesTest.java (2)

40-41: Enforcing class-level @Transactional(readOnly = true).

The rule ensures that service classes are consistently annotated with @Transactional(readOnly = true), aligning with the architectural guidelines for read-only transactions.


43-49: Prohibiting method-level @Transactional(readOnly = true).

This rule prevents methods in service classes from being annotated with @Transactional(readOnly = true), encouraging a design where transaction management is handled at the class level.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/PortfolioServiceHelper.java (2)

20-20: Efficient use of @Transactional(readOnly = true).

Annotating the class with @Transactional(readOnly = true) optimizes performance for read-only operations, ensuring data consistency without unnecessary overhead.


Line range hint 50-74: Simplified method logic.

The removal of CompletableFuture.supplyAsync in favor of direct stream processing makes the code easier to understand and maintain, while still achieving the desired functionality.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/MFSchemeNavService.java (4)

20-21: Imports look good.

The new imports for TransactionTemplate and Assert are necessary for the transaction management and validation logic introduced in the changes.


71-73: Transaction management improvements are effective.

Using transactionTemplate for managing transactions ensures that operations are isolated. The null check assertion enhances robustness.


33-44: Constructor changes are correct.

The addition of TransactionTemplate with PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW is appropriate for managing new transaction scopes.

Ensure that the TransactionTemplate is used correctly throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

TransactionTemplate usage is correctly implemented.

The TransactionTemplate is used effectively to manage transaction scopes in SchemeService, MFSchemeNavService, and MfSchemeDtoToEntityMapperHelper, ensuring robust transaction management with PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW.

  • SchemeService.java: Used for saving entities with proper exception handling.
  • MFSchemeNavService.java: Used for batch saving with transaction management.
  • MfSchemeDtoToEntityMapperHelper.java: Used for saving entity types.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `TransactionTemplate` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `TransactionTemplate`. Expect: Proper usage with correct propagation settings.
rg --type java 'TransactionTemplate'

Length of output: 1280


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather detailed usage of `TransactionTemplate` in the identified files.

# Search for method calls and configurations related to `TransactionTemplate` in the identified files.
rg --type java 'transactionTemplate.execute' -A 5

Length of output: 3059


Line range hint 87-96:
Verify the transaction handling strategy.

The removal of @Transactional(readOnly = true) suggests a change in transaction handling. Ensure this aligns with the overall strategy for these methods.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/NavService.java (1)

19-19: Read-only transaction annotation is appropriate.

Adding @Transactional(readOnly = true) at the class level ensures that all methods are executed in a read-only transaction context, enhancing performance and data integrity.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/XIRRCalculatorService.java (1)

22-22: Read-only transaction annotation is suitable.

The addition of @Transactional(readOnly = true) at the class level ensures that all methods operate in a read-only transaction context, optimizing performance and maintaining data integrity.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java (1)

24-24: Verify read-only transaction suitability.

The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation has been added to the class. Ensure that all methods in this class do not perform any write operations to the database, as this annotation is intended for read-only operations.

Verification successful

Read-only transaction annotation is appropriate.

The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation in CapitalGainsService is suitable as no methods in this class perform write operations. The verification confirms that all operations are read-only.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if any methods in CapitalGainsService perform write operations.

# Test: Search for potential write operations within the class. Expect: No write operations.
rg --type java -A 5 $'(insert|update|delete|save|persist)' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for method calls within CapitalGainsService that might perform write operations indirectly.

# Find all method calls in CapitalGainsService.java
rg --type java --no-heading --line-number --color never '(\w+)\(' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/.$//' | sort | uniq > method_calls.txt

# Check if any of these methods are defined in other classes and perform write operations
while read -r method; do
  rg --type java -A 5 -w "$method" | rg -q '(insert|update|delete|save|persist)' && echo "Potential write operation in method: $method"
done < method_calls.txt

Length of output: 294


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-check method calls within CapitalGainsService for indirect write operations.

# Extract all unique method calls from CapitalGainsService.java
rg --type java --no-heading --line-number --color never '(\w+)\(' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/.$//' | sort | uniq > method_calls.txt

# Verify if these methods are defined elsewhere and involve write operations
while read -r method; do
  rg --type java -A 5 -w "$method" | rg '(insert|update|delete|save|persist)' && echo "Potential write operation in method: $method"
done < method_calls.txt

Length of output: 291


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Directly check for write operations in methods defined in CapitalGainsService.java.

# Search for method definitions and check for write operations within each method
rg --type java -A 10 'public|private|protected' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/CapitalGainsService.java | rg '(insert|update|delete|save|persist)'

Length of output: 163

src/test/java/com/learning/mfscreener/archunit/CustomConditions.java (2)

38-54: Ensure correct annotation checking logic for classes.

The beAnnotatedWithTransactionalReadOnlyTrue condition checks if a class is annotated with @Transactional(readOnly = true). Verify that the logic correctly identifies the presence and attribute of the annotation.


56-73: Ensure correct annotation checking logic for methods.

The notBeAnnotatedWithTransactionalReadOnlyTrue condition checks if a method is annotated with @Transactional(readOnly = true). Verify that the logic correctly identifies the presence and attribute of the annotation.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/GainEntryService.java (1)

16-16: Ensure all methods are read-only.

The addition of @Transactional(readOnly = true) at the class level optimizes performance for read operations. However, verify that no methods perform write operations, as this would conflict with the read-only setting.

Verification successful

All methods are compliant with read-only transactions.

The updateNav method in GainEntryService only updates in-memory variables and performs read operations, ensuring compatibility with the @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation. No write operations were detected.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that no methods in GainEntryService perform write operations.

# Test: Search for methods that might perform write operations.
rg --type java 'save|insert|update|delete' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/GainEntryService.java

Length of output: 275


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of the updateNav method to verify if it performs write operations.
ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'public void updateNav($_) { $$$ }' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/GainEntryService.java

Length of output: 588

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java (4)

101-101: Enhance logging with userCasID.

The logging enhancement in setPANIfNotSet improves traceability by including userCasID. Ensure that sensitive information is not logged inadvertently.


176-176: Isolate transactions with Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW.

The @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW) for saveEntity ensures isolation from existing transactions. Verify that this behavior aligns with the intended use case and that any potential side effects are managed.


42-42: Verify read-only compliance for all methods.

The class-level @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation optimizes performance for read operations. Ensure that methods intended to modify data have appropriate transactional settings to override this default.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Write Operations Properly Configured

The methods in SchemeService intended to modify data are correctly annotated to override the class-level @Transactional(readOnly = true) setting. This ensures that write operations are not constrained by the read-only transaction setting.

  • saveEntity method uses @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW).
  • saveAllEntities method uses @Transactional.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that methods intended to modify data have appropriate transactional settings.

# Test: Search for methods that might perform write operations and ensure they override the read-only setting.
rg --type java '@Transactional' -A 3 'save|insert|update|delete' src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/SchemeService.java

Length of output: 1540


197-197: Clarify transactional behavior for saveAllEntities.

The @Transactional annotation on saveAllEntities should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with the class-level read-only setting. If write operations are intended, confirm that the transactional settings are correct.

src/main/java/com/learning/mfscreener/service/PortfolioService.java (1)

38-38: Verify read-only transaction compatibility.

The @Transactional(readOnly = true) annotation has been added to the PortfolioService class. Ensure that no methods within this class perform write operations that require a non-read-only transaction. Specifically, verify the finalizeUpload method and any other methods that might modify the database.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix: transaction management
2 participants