Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forward-merge branch-25.02 into branch-25.04 #642

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rapids-bot[bot]
Copy link

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Forward-merge triggered by push to branch-25.02 that creates a PR to keep branch-25.04 up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge. See forward-merger docs for more info.

This PR is about how CAGRA's search() and optimize() can be used to iteratively create and improve graph index.

Currently, IVFPQ and NND are used to create the initial kNN graph, which is then optimized to create the CAGRA search graph. So, for example, if you want to support a new data type in CAGRA, you need to create an initial kNN graph with that data type, and IVFPQ or NND must also support that new data type. This is a bit of hassle.

This PR is one solution to that problem. With functionality of this PR, once the CAGRA search supports the new data type, it can be used to create a graph index with it.

Authors:
  - Akira Naruse (https://github.com/anaruse)
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

Approvers:
  - Artem M. Chirkin (https://github.com/achirkin)
  - Tamas Bela Feher (https://github.com/tfeher)

URL: #612
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 2, 2025 07:56
@GPUtester GPUtester merged commit c366d61 into branch-25.04 Feb 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the cpp label Feb 2, 2025
Copy link
Author

rapids-bot bot commented Feb 2, 2025

SUCCESS - forward-merge complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants