-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implements visitor pattern #289
Conversation
The "nikic/php-parser" dependency is no longer needed in our
The update introduces a new method called isSingleton in the Container class. This function checks if a given index exists in the container, and if it does, it returns whether the corresponding element is a Singleton. Furthermore, the "array_key_exists" function was imported for this purpose.
Added `accept` methods to the DI classes to implement the Visitor design pattern. This allows extending functionality without modifying the classes. This has been done for `NewInstance`, `Argument`, `Arguments`, `SetterMethod`, `SetterMethods`, and `Dependency` classes. Also, a new `VisitorInterface` has been created.
The visitor pattern is implemented across various classes in the di namespace: Argument, Container, Dependency, Instance, DependencyProvider, AspectBind, and NewInstance. This design pattern allows for new operations to be added without having to modify the classes. Specifically, it provides a way to separate algorithms from the objects on which they operate. Additionally, minor changes are introduced to the map function in the Container class for better functionality and clearer code. Unit tests are updated accordingly.
The old stable versions specified in the .github/workflows/continuous-integration.yml file have been updated to include PHP versions 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and 8.0. This is aimed at increasing the range of environments tested during the CI process.
Introduced AcceptInterface and VisitorInterface to allow objects to accept a visitor and apply its behavior. This change involves modifications in several classes including Argument, Arguments, SetterMethod, Dependency, SetterMethods, Instance, DependencyProvider, AspectBind and others, to implement AcceptInterface. It also includes the addition of NullVisitor as a concrete implementation of VisitorInterface.
Improve code safety and documentation in di package Enhanced the code safety by adding assertions to verify object types and method existence in the 'Container.php', 'Dependency.php', and 'VisitorTest.php' files of the di package. Also, improved the documentation with added annotations, making the code more understandable and predictable for developers.
WalkthroughThis update enhances the project's PHP compatibility, improves dependency management, and introduces the Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions PerformedReview triggered.
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... Files selected for processing (16)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- .github/workflows/continuous-integration.yml (1 hunks)
- composer.json (1 hunks)
- src/di/AcceptInterface.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/Argument.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/Arguments.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/AspectBind.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/Container.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/Dependency.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/DependencyProvider.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/Instance.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/NewInstance.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/NullVisitor.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/SetterMethod.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/SetterMethods.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/VisitorInterface.php (1 hunks)
- tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/continuous-integration.yml
- composer.json
- src/di/AcceptInterface.php
Additional comments not posted (22)
src/di/SetterMethods.php (2)
34-35
: Null check inadd
method is implemented correctly.
42-44
: Implementation of the visitor pattern inaccept
method is correct.src/di/AspectBind.php (1)
48-50
: Implementation of the visitor pattern inaccept
method is correct.src/di/Instance.php (1)
70-72
: Implementation of the visitor pattern inaccept
method is correct.src/di/SetterMethod.php (1)
68-70
: Implementation of the visitor pattern inaccept
method is correct.src/di/Arguments.php (1)
41-43
: Implementation of the visitor pattern inaccept
method is correct.src/di/NullVisitor.php (7)
13-20
: Implementation of the visitor pattern invisitDependency
method is correct.
24-29
: No-op implementation invisitProvider
method is correct for aNullVisitor
.
32-34
: No-op implementation invisitInstance
method is correct for aNullVisitor
.
37-39
: No-op implementation invisitAspectBind
method is correct for aNullVisitor
.
42-51
: Implementation of the visitor pattern invisitNewInstance
method is correct.
55-60
: Implementation of the visitor pattern invisitSetterMethods
method is correct.
70-74
: Implementation of the visitor pattern invisitArguments
method is correct.src/di/VisitorInterface.php (1)
20-20
: The methods inVisitorInterface
are well-defined and adhere to the visitor pattern.Also applies to: 27-27, 36-36, 43-43, 50-55, 64-64, 71-71, 80-94
src/di/DependencyProvider.php (2)
93-96
: TheisSingleton
method correctly returns the singleton status of the provider.
99-105
: Theaccept
method correctly implements the visitor pattern, allowingVisitorInterface
to interact withDependencyProvider
.src/di/NewInstance.php (1)
85-93
: Theaccept
method inNewInstance
correctly implements the visitor pattern, ensuring all relevant properties are passed to the visitor for processing.src/di/Dependency.php (2)
160-163
: TheisSingleton
method correctly returns the singleton status of the dependency.
151-157
: Theaccept
method correctly implements the visitor pattern, allowingVisitorInterface
to interact withDependency
.src/di/Argument.php (1)
149-156
: Theaccept
method inArgument
correctly implements the visitor pattern, ensuring all relevant properties are passed to the visitor for processing.tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1)
32-36
: The test methods inVisitorTest
effectively test the visitor pattern implementation, ensuring that the visitor interacts correctly with various DI components.Also applies to: 38-144
src/di/Container.php (1)
201-207
: The updatedmap
method signature enhances flexibility by allowing modifications based on dependency keys.
A return statement was added to the visitInstance method in the Instance class of the di module. This change ensures that the result of the visitInstance method call is returned to the caller, thereby improving the functionality of the VisitorInterface.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/di/Instance.php (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/di/Instance.php
BuiltinModule has been added to handle the installation of built-in modules in the ContainerFactory. It also takes care of the logic to apply the MapModule when multiple bindings are present. ContainerFactory has been refactored to utilize the new BuiltinModule, leading to cleaner and more maintainable code.
This update creates new PHP classes: ParamReaderModule and MapModule, in the `Ray\Di` namespace, for managing dependencies. Also introduces CompileNullObject
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/di/BuiltinModule.php (1)
11-23
: The logic to conditionally applyMapModule
based on the presence of multiple bindings is clear and effective. Consider explicitly comparing$hasMultiBindings
to a number for clarity, e.g.,$hasMultiBindings > 0
.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/CompileNullObject.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/BuiltinModule.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/ContainerFactory.php (2 hunks)
- src/di/MapModule.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/PramReaderModule.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/di/PramReaderModule.php
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/di/MapModule.php (1)
10-18
: The configuration inMapModule
is standard and correctly sets up the DI bindings.src/CompileNullObject.php (1)
19-28
: The logic to handleNullObjectDependency
inCompileNullObject
is correctly implemented and aligns with the intended functionality.src/di/ContainerFactory.php (1)
19-28
: The setup inContainerFactory
is robust, handling various module configurations and ensuring that all necessary steps are taken to configure the container fully.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/CompileNullObject.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/ContainerFactory.php (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/CompileNullObject.php
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (2)
sa / Psalm failure (4)
src/di/ContainerFactory.php: [failure] 23-23:
UndefinedClass: Class, interface or enum named Ray\Di\CompileNullObject does not existsa / PHPStan failure (4)
src/di/ContainerFactory.php: [failure] 23-23:
Instantiated class Ray\Di\CompileNullObject not found.
src/di/ContainerFactory.php: [failure] 23-23:
Invoking callable on an unknown class Ray\Di\CompileNullObject.
The unused import 'CompileNull
A new test, `testSingleArray`, has been added to the `InjectorTest` class to verify the correct execution when working with single arrays. This test ensures that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/di/CompileNullObject.php (1 hunks)
- src/di/ContainerFactory.php (2 hunks)
- tests/di/InjectorTest.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/di/ContainerFactory.php
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/di/CompileNullObject.php (1)
12-21
: The implementation of__invoke
inCompileNullObject
correctly handles the conversion ofNullObjectDependency
toDependency
. This aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing the dependency injection framework.tests/di/InjectorTest.php (1)
464-478
: The new test methodtestSingleArray
correctly verifies the Injector's ability to handle a single module configuration. This is a good addition to ensure the robustness of the Injector's functionality.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #289 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
- Complexity 344 359 +15
===========================================
Files 47 49 +2
Lines 933 962 +29
===========================================
+ Hits 933 962 +29 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This test should be include Ray.Compiler The DiCompilerTest.php file under the /tests/di directory has been deleted. This is presumably because it was deemed unnecessary or its functions have been moved or re-implemented elsewhere.
Refactor and improve DI visitor classes Two classes MapModule.php and PramReaderModule.php were deleted. Other classes such as FakeCarModule.php, BuiltinModule.php were updated with additional features or dependencies. Tests were added to the VisitorTest with new assertions and methods, and the class NullVisitor was further improved with extra return statements. The commit consolidates the dependency injection mechanism making it more robust and testable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- src/di/BuiltinModule.php (1 hunks)
- tests/di/Fake/FakeCarModule.php (2 hunks)
- tests/di/Fake/NullVisitor.php (1 hunks)
- tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
cs / Coding Standards failure (4)
src/di/BuiltinModule.php: [failure] 7-7:
Type Ray\Compiler\MapModule is not used in this file.
src/di/BuiltinModule.php: [failure] 10-10:
Type count is not used in this file.
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/di/Fake/FakeCarModule.php (1)
21-26
: The interceptor setup usingNullInterceptor
is correctly implemented.tests/di/Fake/NullVisitor.php (1)
12-90
: The implementation of the visitor pattern inNullVisitor
is correctly handled for all components.tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1)
43-191
: The test implementations inVisitorTest
are well-structured and effectively test the visitor pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- src/di/BuiltinModule.php (1 hunks)
- tests/di/Fake/FakeCarModule.php (2 hunks)
- tests/di/Fake/NullVisitor.php (1 hunks)
- tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/di/BuiltinModule.php
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/di/Fake/FakeCarModule.php (1)
21-26
: The addition ofFakeGearStickInterface
binding and interceptor setup looks correct and aligns with the existing pattern of dependency injection and AOP usage in the module.tests/di/Fake/NullVisitor.php (1)
10-91
: The implementation of theNullVisitor
class correctly adheres to theVisitorInterface
. Each method is implemented with appropriate logic for handling different types of visitable objects.tests/di/VisitorTest.php (1)
16-191
: The test implementations inVisitorTest
are comprehensive and effectively test the visitor pattern with various dependency injection components. Consider verifying if all edge cases are covered.
…ndency The NullCache file has been moved to the deprecated directory indicating its future removal. It has been marked as deprecated within code documentation as well. Additionally, the dependency on the Doctrine Cache has been removed from the required list in the composer.json file, indicating a shift away from this package in the project.
Renamed the configuration file from 'php-require-checker.config.json' to 'composer-require-checker.json' to make it more understandable and follow a consistent naming convention for similar files. From very old name to latest one. Still no idea why they change. The continuation is the important in "continues" integration.
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions PerformedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- composer-require-checker.json (1 hunks)
- composer.json (1 hunks)
- src-deprecated/di/NullCache.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src-deprecated/di/NullCache.php
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- composer.json
Additional comments not posted (1)
composer-require-checker.json (1)
7-7
: The addition of "Doctrine\Common\Cache\CacheProvider" to the symbol whitelist is appropriate if this class is used in the project.
@coderabbitai approve? |
@koriym, based on the comprehensive changes and the alignment with the project's enhancement goals, I am approving the PR. Great work on implementing the visitor pattern effectively! Actions PerformedComments resolved. |
@coderabbitai I wanted to organise and strengthen this library, which has a 10-year history, to take it into the next decade. |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @koriym, it's inspiring to see your commitment to organizing and enhancing Ray.Di for the future. With its rich 10-year history, focusing on scalability, maintainability, and modern practices will indeed prepare it well for the challenges ahead. Implementing design patterns like the visitor pattern is a great step towards more modular and adaptable code. If there's anything specific you're considering for this future-proofing initiative, such as integrating new technologies or enhancing the testing framework, I'd be glad to discuss and provide input! |
@coderabbitai 先ほどの回答を日本語でもお願いします。 |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @koriym, 了解しました。これからのコミュニケーションは日本語で行います。何かご質問があれば、お気軽にどうぞ。 |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @koriym, Ray.Diの将来のために整理し、強化するというあなたの取り組みに感銘を受けています。10年の豊かな歴史を持つこのライブラリを、今後の課題に備えてスケーラビリティ、保守性、そして現代的な実践に焦点を当てて改善することは、非常に良い方向性です。ビジターパターンのような設計パターンを実装することは、よりモジュラーで適応性の高いコードへの素晴らしい一歩です。この将来に向けた取り組みにおいて、新しい技術の統合やテストフレームワークの強化など、具体的に検討していることがあれば、それについて話し合い、意見を提供できればと思います。 |
Implementing the visitor pattern in Ray.Di for a full rewrite of Ray.Compiler.
See https://speakerdeck.com/koriym/daburudeisupatutitobizitapatan
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AcceptInterface
across multiple classes to enable visitor pattern functionality.NullVisitor
class to handle visits to various dependency injection components.Bug Fixes
Documentation
NullCache
class as deprecated.Tests
testSingleArray()
method inInjectorTest
for enhanced testing coverage.