-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ruby): upgrade versions & dependencies #1067
Conversation
@@ -134,5 +128,17 @@ def host_header | |||
'Host' => @request.host | |||
}.compact | |||
end | |||
|
|||
def read_body(io) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndriiAndreiev what's the context behind this method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't find any exact solutions for this, but this method seems to fix it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndriiAndreiev can you add a test case for this? Looks good to me, but I'd love some additional confidence in our code base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
echoing that it would be nice to see a test case added for the body reading changes but otherwise this looks good
# commit-message: | ||
# prefix: chore(deps) | ||
# prefix-development: chore(deps-dev) | ||
- package-ecosystem: bundler |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: might be mistaken, but I don't believe this is related to the other changes. If not, given we squash and merge commits from PRs, maybe let's move this to a separate PR so we have a more distinct commit history post-merge.
@AndriiAndreiev can you resolve conflicts here? Happy to merge after. |
🧰 Changes