Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve contract needed for energy network component #521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor

The energy component doesn't need full EnergyStorages since it doesn't need following operations:

  • Extracting energy with simulation
  • Receiving energy

This will be relevant when implementing the relay since they will add an energy storage to the outer network when energy sharing is enabled.

The energy component doesn't need full EnergyStorages since it doesn't need following operations:
* Extracting energy with simulation
* Receiving energy

This will be relevant when implementing the relay since they will add an energy storage to the
outer network when energy sharing is enabled.
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 5, 2024

@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge merged commit 3faf3ae into develop Apr 5, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge deleted the feat/GH-80/energy-contract branch April 5, 2024 20:00
@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor Author

This enables #108

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant