feat(bundler): add git refs support

[Djiit]

Changes

Added git refs support for the bundler manager.

Context

Fixes #30990

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

• I have updated the documentation, or
• No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

• Code inspection only, or
• Newly added/modified unit tests, or
• No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
• Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

[Djiit]

Hey team, do you need anything from me to get this merged? Thank you 🙏 cc @rarkins

[rarkins]

Merged failed with this:

> tsc "--noEmit"

Error: lib/modules/manager/bundler/extract.ts(172,28): error TS23[39](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/actions/runs/11952139756/job/33317261723#step:4:40): Property 'registryUrl' does not exist on type 'string'.
Error: lib/modules/manager/bundler/extract.ts(173,45): error TS2339: Property 'registryUrl' does not exist on type 'string'.
Error: lib/modules/manager/bundler/extract.ts(176,28): error TS2339: Property 'sourceName' does not exist on type 'string'.
Error: lib/modules/manager/bundler/extract.ts(177,55): error TS2339: Property 'sourceName' does not exist on type 'string'.

Not sure why it was caught in the merge queue and not in PR.

[rarkins]

Now it failed here!

[rarkins]

There now seems to be a refactoring of the existing and non git refs logic too?

[Djiit]

There now seems to be a refactoring of the existing and non git refs logic too?

Hey @rarkins , @viceice suggested I moved the regex at the module levels, so I did this for all the regexes here.
Other changes are also here to align practices, without any functional changes. Anything you'd like me to remove?

[Djiit]

Also I'd need your help on the CI: I have not added any snapshots, just updated the existing ones (as some were already containing what was not yet parsed a gitrefs). How can I make this pass?

[rarkins]

I was referring to the changes under the "if (gemMatch)" logic branch. Is that logic meant to be the same as before? That logic is now all red and green in the diff.

[Djiit]

Yes that's the same.

[rarkins]

Yes that's the same.

There's a change in logic regarding sourceName. Is it intentional or accidental?

[Djiit]

Hu, that's my bad, I failed to put a comment about this. As registryUrl and sourceName are exclusive, I thought it was ok to transform the if into a else if. I reverted this change; it can be tackled in another PR not to interfer with the main change.
Thanks for your review.

[rarkins]

I think it was ok to make that change (I agree with you re: mutual exclusivity) but I wanted to check that it's intentional.