-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add JSON schema #73
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nickdnk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughA new JSON schema file, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema.json (1)
10-10
: Consider a more restrictive pattern for service namesThe current pattern allows names that might be confusing or problematic (e.g., starting with dots/dashes, consecutive special characters). Consider a more restrictive pattern:
- "^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$": { + "^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]+(?:[._-][a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$": {This ensures:
- Names start with a letter
- Special characters can't be consecutive
- Special characters can't appear at the end
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- schema.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
schema.json (1)
65-67
: Verify schema integration with the codebaseThe schema looks well-structured. Let's verify its integration with the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Schema is properly integrated and used in the codebase
The schema is actively used in the codebase with proper implementation:
- Config struct in
config.go
matches the schema structure withServices map[string]*Service
- Service struct fields align with schema properties using
mapstructure
tags- Configuration is properly unmarshaled via
UnmarshalKey
inplugin.go
- Service processes are created and managed based on this configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify schema integration and usage # Test 1: Check if schema is referenced in Go code echo "Checking for schema usage in Go code..." rg -t go "schema.*\.json" -A 5 # Test 2: Look for example configurations that should validate against this schema echo "Looking for example configurations..." fd -e yaml -e json --exec grep -l "service"Length of output: 301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive verification approach # Check for any JSON schema validation code echo "Checking for JSON schema validation patterns..." rg -t go "json\.Valid|json\.Schema|jsonschema" -A 5 # Look for imports or uses of JSON schema validation libraries echo "Checking for schema validation imports..." rg "github.com.*json.*schema|encoding/json" # Check the actual content of schema.json echo "Checking schema.json content..." cat schema.json # Look for configuration loading or parsing code echo "Looking for config loading code..." rg -t go "LoadConfig|ParseConfig|ReadConfig" -A 5Length of output: 3189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for actual service plugin implementation and configuration usage # Look for service plugin initialization and configuration echo "Checking for service plugin code..." rg -t go "type Service struct" -A 10 # Look for configuration struct definitions echo "Checking for config structs..." ast-grep --pattern 'type Config struct { $$$ }' # Check for JSON unmarshaling or config validation echo "Checking for config validation..." rg -t go "UnmarshalJSON|Validate|ValidateConfig" -A 5 # Look for plugin registration echo "Looking for plugin registration..." rg -t go "Plugin.*Service|NewService" -A 5Length of output: 2823
Minor adjustments
Reason for This PR
Add JSON schema.
Description of Changes
Add JSON schema.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]
git commit -s
).CHANGELOG.md
.Summary by CodeRabbit