chore(ci): add semantic pr and release #54
Conversation
WalkthroughTwo new GitHub Actions workflow files have been added to automate processes related to pull requests and releases. The Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/semantic_pull_request.yml (1)
17-20: LGTM! Consider adding custom configuration options.The use of
amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v5is appropriate for enforcing semantic pull request titles, and pinning to a specific version (v5) is good for stability. TheGITHUB_TOKENis correctly referenced from secrets.Consider adding custom configuration options to tailor the action to your project's needs. For example:
- uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v5 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} with: types: ['feat', 'fix', 'docs', 'style', 'refactor', 'perf', 'test', 'build', 'ci', 'chore', 'revert'] requireScope: false subjectPattern: ^(?![A-Z]).+$ subjectPatternError: | The subject "{subject}" found in the pull request title "{title}" didn't match the configured pattern. Please ensure that the subject starts with a lowercase letter. wip: true validateSingleCommit: falseThis configuration example adds more specific rules for commit types, scope requirements, and subject patterns. Adjust these settings based on your project's conventions.
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (2)
14-17: Consider breaking long lines for better readability.The Configure Semantic Release step is a good workaround for non-npm projects. However, the long lines in the comments and
echocommand exceed the recommended 80 characters limit.Consider breaking the long lines for better readability:
- name: Configure Semantic Release # Work around for non npm project # REF: https://github.com/cycjimmy/semantic-release-action/issues/115 # #issuecomment-1817264419 run: | echo '{ "branches":[], "plugins":[ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", "@semantic-release/github" ] }' > .releaserc.json🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: lint / yamllint
[failure] 16-16:
16:81 [line-length] line too long (101 > 80 characters)
[failure] 17-17:
17:81 [line-length] line too long (172 > 80 characters)
1-24: Overall, the semantic release workflow is well-structured and follows best practices.The workflow effectively implements semantic versioning for releases, which will help maintain a clear and consistent release history. It follows a logical structure: checkout, configure, and create release.
For future improvements, consider:
- Adding caching mechanisms if there are any build or dependency installation steps.
- Implementing artifact uploads if there are build outputs that need to be stored.
- Including additional checks or tests before creating the release.
These suggestions are not critical for the current implementation but could enhance the workflow as the project grows.
🧰 Tools
GitHub Check: lint / yamllint
[failure] 16-16:
16:81 [line-length] line too long (101 > 80 characters)
[failure] 17-17:
17:81 [line-length] line too long (172 > 80 characters)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/semantic_pull_request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
GitHub Check: lint / yamllint
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml
[failure] 16-16:
16:81 [line-length] line too long (101 > 80 characters)
[failure] 17-17:
17:81 [line-length] line too long (172 > 80 characters)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (7)
.github/workflows/semantic_pull_request.yml (3)
1-8: LGTM! Good security practice withpull_request_target.The workflow name accurately describes its purpose, and the trigger events are appropriate for checking pull request titles. Using
pull_request_targetinstead ofpull_requestis a good security practice, especially when the workflow needs to access secrets, as it runs in the context of the base repository.
10-11: LGTM! Explicit permissions enhance security.Setting explicit permissions to
readfor pull-requests follows the principle of least privilege. This is a good security practice as it ensures the workflow has only the necessary access rights to perform its task.
13-16: LGTM! Job configuration is appropriate.The job configuration is well-defined. The name "conventional-commit-pr-title" clearly describes its purpose, and using the latest Ubuntu runner ensures access to up-to-date dependencies.
.github/workflows/semantic_release.yml (4)
1-6: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are well-defined.The workflow name "Semantic Release" is clear and descriptive. The trigger on pushes to the main branch is appropriate for a release workflow, ensuring that new releases are created automatically when changes are merged into the main branch.
8-10: LGTM: Job setup is appropriate.The job name "release" is concise and descriptive. Using the latest Ubuntu runner (
ubuntu-latest) is a good practice, ensuring the workflow runs on an up-to-date environment.
12-13: LGTM: Checkout step is correctly configured.The checkout step uses the latest major version of the
actions/checkoutaction (v4), which is a good practice for staying up-to-date with the latest features and security improvements.
18-24: LGTM: Create Release step is well-configured.The Create Release step uses the
cycjimmy/semantic-release-action@v4action with appropriate configuration. The use of theGITHUB_TOKENsecret is correct for GitHub authentication.
Overview
Summary by CodeRabbit
semantic_pull_request.ymlto enhance pull request handling.semantic_release.ymlfor automated versioning and release creation based on commit messages.These changes streamline the development process and improve release efficiency.