-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add execution API disclaimer to docs #521
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Vue component named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
.vitepress/components/execution_callout.vue (2)
15-19
: Consider adopting TypeScriptThe component could benefit from TypeScript for better maintainability and type safety.
Example TypeScript conversion:
-<script> +<script lang="ts"> +import { defineComponent } from 'vue' + -export default { +export default defineComponent({ name: 'ExecutionCallout', -} +}) </script>
21-23
: Add styles to enhance visual prominenceThe disclaimer would be more effective with some visual styling to draw attention.
Consider adding these styles:
<style scoped> -/* Add any custom styles for the component here */ +.div { + margin: 1rem 0; + padding: 1rem; + border-left: 4px solid #f97316; + background-color: #fff7ed; + border-radius: 0.375rem; +} + +p { + margin: 0; + color: #9a3412; + font-size: 0.875rem; + line-height: 1.5; +} + +a { + color: #ea580c; + text-decoration: underline; + text-underline-offset: 2px; +} + +a:hover { + color: #9a3412; +} </style>tutorials/execution/octane-evm.md (1)
3-9
: Remove unused importconstants
The
constants
import from../../.vitepress/constants/constants.js
appears to be unused in this file.<script setup> import Callout from '../../.vitepress/components/callout.vue' import ExecutionCallout from '../../.vitepress/components/execution_callout.vue' -import constants from '../../.vitepress/constants/constants.js' </script>
tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md (1)
Repository and URL references need updates in the tutorial
The verification revealed several discrepancies that need to be addressed:
- The gm-portal repository is referenced incorrectly. While the tutorial mentions
artela-network/gm-portal
, the actual repository is under therollkit
organization.- All example repository links (reentrancy guard, black list aspect, throttler aspect, etc.) point to the correct
artela-network
organization and include therollkit
branch.- The contract address
0x9fcEbD70654D360b41ccD123dADAAad6ce13C788
is correctly referenced in the tutorial.- The npm package
@artela-next/aspect-tool
exists and is actively maintained.- The documentation links to artela.network are valid and accessible.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
96-106
: Verify the accuracy of replacement values and URLsThe tutorial contains specific replacement instructions with URLs, contract addresses, and package names. Let's verify their accuracy:
Also applies to: 108-114
Let me analyze the verification results:
The gm-portal repository exists and is accessible, but it's under
rollkit/gm-portal
instead ofartela-network/gm-portal
as shown in the output.The contract address verification attempt failed because it was trying to connect to a local node (localhost:8545) which isn't available in the sandbox environment.
The
@artela-next/aspect-tool
package exists on npm and is actively maintained, with the latest version being 0.0.61.Let me verify the content further by checking for any contract addresses or URLs mentioned in the tutorial:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and accessibility of referenced repositories and packages # Check if the gm-portal repository exists and is accessible gh repo view artela-network/gm-portal # Verify if the specified contract address has any transactions curl -s http://localhost:8545 -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getTransactionCount","params":["0x9fcEbD70654D360b41ccD123dADAAad6ce13C788", "latest"],"id":1}' # Check if the aspect-tool package exists on npm curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@artela-next/aspect-toolLength of output: 6927
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for contract addresses and URLs in the tutorial rg -i "0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}" tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md rg -i "http[s]?://[^\s)>]+" tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.mdLength of output: 2352
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/beaconkit.md (1)
Line range hint
18-300
: LGTM with enhancement suggestions.The tutorial content is well-structured and comprehensive. Consider these optional improvements:
- Add expected output or success criteria after each major step
- Include version information for prerequisites
- Add links to related tutorials or documentation where mentioned
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/cosmwasm.md (3)
Line range hint
171-174
: Add error handling guidance for Docker commandsConsider adding error handling guidance for common Docker issues, such as permission errors or network connectivity problems.
Add a troubleshooting section like:
+ ### Troubleshooting Docker Commands + + If you encounter permission errors: + - Ensure Docker daemon is running: `systemctl status docker` + - Add your user to the docker group: `sudo usermod -aG docker $USER` + + If you face network issues: + - Check Docker network connectivity: `docker network ls` + - Verify the container can reach the network: `docker exec $CW ping 8.8.8.8`🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
Line range hint
186-193
: Explain sudo usage and provide alternativeThe
sudo
command is used without explanation. Consider explaining why it's needed and provide a non-sudo alternative.+ # If you're part of the docker group, you can run without sudo: docker run --rm -v "$(pwd)":/code \ --mount type=volume,source="$(basename "$(pwd)")_cache",target=/code/target \ --mount type=volume,source=registry_cache,target=/usr/local/cargo/registry \ cosmwasm/rust-optimizer:0.12.6 + # Otherwise, use sudo: sudo docker run ...🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
Line range hint
219-222
: Add verification steps after contract deploymentConsider adding steps to verify the contract deployment was successful before proceeding.
TX_HASH=$(wasmd tx wasm store cw_nameservice.wasm --from localwasm-key --keyring-backend test --chain-id localwasm --gas-prices 0.025uwasm --gas auto --gas-adjustment 1.3 --node http://127.0.0.1:36657 --output json -y | jq -r '.txhash') && echo $TX_HASH + # Verify the transaction was successful + wasmd query tx $TX_HASH --node http://127.0.0.1:36657 --output json | jq '.code' + # Expected output: 0 (indicates success)🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML(MD033, no-inline-html)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.vitepress/components/execution_callout.vue
(1 hunks).vitepress/config.ts
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/beaconkit.md
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/cosmwasm.md
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/evm-contract-interaction.md
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/octane-evm.md
(1 hunks)tutorials/execution/polaris-evm.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/beaconkit.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/cosmwasm.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/evm-contract-interaction.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/octane-evm.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/polaris-evm.md
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
tutorials/execution/octane-evm.md (2)
11-16
: LGTM! Well-structured implementation of the execution API disclaimer
The implementation effectively achieves the PR objective by:
- Using appropriate warning/tip containers for visual distinction
- Placing the disclaimer prominently at the top of the document
- Utilizing Vue components for consistent styling across docs
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15
: Verify the ExecutionCallout component content
Let's ensure the ExecutionCallout component contains the appropriate disclaimer message about execution API updates.
✅ Verification successful
ExecutionCallout component contains appropriate disclaimer message
The component correctly implements a disclaimer message that:
- Informs about the ongoing execution overhaul with go-execution interface
- Warns about outdated execution tutorials pending updates
- Provides proper guidance for questions via GitHub issues or Telegram
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the content of the ExecutionCallout component
# Look for the ExecutionCallout component implementation
cat $(fd -t f "execution_callout.vue" .vitepress/components) || echo "Component file not found"
Length of output: 887
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/evm-contract-interaction.md (2)
3-9
: LGTM: Well-structured Vue.js setup
The script setup follows Vue.js best practices with proper component imports and markdownlint configuration.
11-16
: LGTM: Strategic placement of execution API disclaimer
The ExecutionCallout component is appropriately placed at the beginning of the tutorial for maximum visibility, ensuring users are aware of important execution API updates before proceeding.
Let's verify the ExecutionCallout component implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: ExecutionCallout component contains appropriate disclaimer
The ExecutionCallout component is properly implemented with the execution API disclaimer, containing:
- Clear notice about the ongoing execution overhaul
- Link to the new go-execution interface
- Warning about outdated execution tutorials
- Links for support via GitHub issues and Telegram
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ExecutionCallout component exists and contains the disclaimer
# Check if the ExecutionCallout component exists
fd -e vue "execution_callout.vue" .vitepress/components/
# View the component content
cat $(fd -e vue "execution_callout.vue" .vitepress/components/)
Length of output: 991
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md (2)
3-9
: LGTM: Well-structured Vue component setup
The component imports and markdownlint configurations are properly organized.
11-16
: LGTM: Effective placement of callouts
The warning block with ExecutionCallout effectively implements the execution API disclaimer requirement, while the tip block provides additional context. Their placement at the start ensures high visibility.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/beaconkit.md (2)
4-9
: LGTM: Component imports and script setup are correct.
The Vue component imports and markdownlint configuration are properly structured.
11-16
: Verify the existence of the referenced components.
The placement and structure of the callouts look good, enhancing visibility of important information.
✅ Verification successful
Components verified and correctly placed
Both Callout
and ExecutionCallout
components exist in the expected location at .vitepress/components/
, confirming their availability for use in the documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the referenced Vue components
fd -e vue "callout.vue|execution_callout.vue" .vitepress/components/
Length of output: 148
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
tutorials/execution/polaris-evm.md (3)
3-9
: LGTM: Component setup follows Vue.js best practices
The script setup correctly imports the necessary components and constants. The markdownlint warnings about inline HTML are expected and can be safely ignored as they are necessary for Vue.js components.
11-17
: LGTM: Well-placed disclaimer components
The placement of the Callout and ExecutionCallout components at the beginning of the document ensures high visibility. The semantic wrapping (tip/warning) appropriately conveys the importance levels of the messages.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
Line range hint 382-383
: Verify the reliability of the Mocha testnet RPC endpoint
While the change from local devnet to Mocha testnet RPC is correct, we should verify the reliability and stability of the public RPC endpoint.
✅ Verification successful
RPC endpoint verification successful with good response time
The Mocha testnet RPC endpoint (https://rpc-mocha.pops.one) demonstrates:
- Fast response time of ~0.73 seconds
- Correct JSON structure with expected block height format
- Stable and accessible endpoint
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the availability and response time of the Mocha testnet RPC endpoint
# Test RPC endpoint availability and response time
curl -w "\nTime: %{time_total}s\n" -o /dev/null -s https://rpc-mocha.pops.one/block
# Verify if the endpoint returns the expected block height format
curl -s https://rpc-mocha.pops.one/block | jq -e '.result.block.header.height' > /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Response format verification: OK"
else
echo "Response format verification: Failed"
fi
Length of output: 274
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
12-12: Element: Callout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
19-19: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
.vitepress/config.ts (1)
278-291
: LGTM! Consistent organization of execution tutorials.
The reorganization of execution tutorials under a standardized path structure improves navigation and maintainability.
Let's verify that all referenced tutorial files exist:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the files using fd
as recommended in the instructions.
✅ All referenced tutorial files exist and are properly organized
All the tutorial files referenced in the sidebar configuration are present in the tutorials/execution/
directory:
- tutorials/execution/cosmwasm.md
- tutorials/execution/octane-evm.md
- tutorials/execution/beaconkit.md
- tutorials/execution/artela-evm-plus-plus.md
- tutorials/execution/evm-contract-interaction.md
The sidebar structure correctly maps to the actual file organization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify existence of execution tutorial files
# Check for each referenced tutorial file
for file in cosmwasm octane-evm beaconkit artela-evm-plus-plus evm-contract-interaction; do
echo "Checking for /tutorials/execution/$file.md"
if ! [ -f "tutorials/execution/$file.md" ]; then
echo "Warning: Missing file tutorials/execution/$file.md"
fi
done
Length of output: 1272
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for markdown files in tutorials/execution directory
fd -e md . tutorials/execution/
# Also check if the tutorials/execution directory exists
if [ -d "tutorials/execution" ]; then
echo "tutorials/execution directory exists"
else
echo "tutorials/execution directory does not exist"
fi
Length of output: 375
tutorials/execution/cosmwasm.md (2)
5-7
: LGTM: Import statements are properly configured
The import statements correctly reference the components and constants from the .vitepress
directory.
14-16
: LGTM: Execution disclaimer properly implemented
The ExecutionCallout
component is appropriately wrapped in a warning block for visibility, aligning with the PR's objective to add the execution API disclaimer.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
15-15: Element: ExecutionCallout
Inline HTML
(MD033, no-inline-html)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK.
88e1ba2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Overview
To help us bridge the gap between updating the execution tutorials and the execution API updates, I thought it would be a good idea to add a disclaimer.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ExecutionCallout
component to inform users about updates to the Rollkit execution system and encourage feedback.Documentation Improvements
These changes enhance user experience by providing clearer instructions and improving the overall structure of the documentation.