Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add documentation for docker image #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MSevey
Copy link
Contributor

@MSevey MSevey commented Nov 13, 2024

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new target in the Makefile for building a Docker image for the local-da application.
    • Added detailed instructions in the README for using the local-da binary and running the service with Docker.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated the Dockerfile to improve command execution, allowing for better command-line argument handling when starting the container.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced the README.md with sections on usage for both the local-da binary and Docker, providing clearer setup instructions.

@MSevey MSevey self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Dockerfile, Makefile, and README.md. The Dockerfile now uses ENTRYPOINT to specify the main executable and separates the command-line arguments into CMD. A new target for building a Docker image has been added to the Makefile, along with a declaration for it as a phony target. The README.md has been updated to include instructions for using the local-da binary and Docker, enhancing the documentation for users.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile Replaced CMD with ENTRYPOINT for local-da, separated arguments into CMD.
Makefile Added new target docker-build for building the Docker image and declared it as a phony target.
README.md Updated with sections for using the local-da binary and Docker, including build and run instructions.

Poem

In the garden where code does play,
The rabbit hops, brightening the day.
With Docker now, and targets anew,
Building and running, so easy to do!
"local-da" shines, a service so grand,
Come join the fun, lend us a hand! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, tuxcanfly, yarikbratashchuk and gupadhyaya and removed request for a team November 13, 2024 19:30
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 1-1: Fix invalid Go version in base image

The Dockerfile uses golang:1.23-alpine which is invalid as Go 1.23 doesn't exist yet. The latest stable version is Go 1.21.x.

Apply this fix:

-FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM golang:1.23-alpine AS build-env
+FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM golang:1.21-alpine AS build-env

Line range hint 1-22: Consider security improvements

The container runs as root by default, which is not a security best practice.

Consider adding these security improvements:

 FROM alpine:3.18.3
 
 WORKDIR /root
 
+# Create non-root user
+RUN adduser -D localda
 
 # Copy over binaries from the build-env
 COPY --from=build-env /src/main /usr/bin/local-da
+
+# Set ownership
+RUN chown localda:localda /usr/bin/local-da
 
 EXPOSE 7980
 
+# Switch to non-root user
+USER localda
+
 ENTRYPOINT ["local-da"]
 CMD ["-listen-all"]

Go version mismatch confirmed between Dockerfile and go.mod

The verification confirms a version mismatch:

  • go.mod specifies Go 1.21.1
  • Dockerfile uses golang:1.23-alpine
  • Build command uses -compat=1.19

This creates three different version references which could lead to compatibility issues:

  • The build environment uses a newer version (1.23) than the module requires (1.21.1)
  • The compatibility flag (-compat=1.19) is set to an older version than both
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 6-7: Review Go version compatibility

There's a version mismatch between go.mod compatibility (1.19) and the Go version used in the build (1.23). This could lead to unexpected behavior.

Let's check the go.mod file for the required Go version:


Let me verify the Go version in the Dockerfile to compare with the go.mod version.


Let me try a different approach to check the Dockerfile content.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Go version requirements in go.mod
grep -A 1 "^go " go.mod

Length of output: 36


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Go version specified in Dockerfile
rg -A 1 "FROM golang:" Dockerfile

Length of output: 35


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the complete content of Dockerfile to check Go version specification
cat Dockerfile

Length of output: 413

README.md (1)

Line range hint 9-32: Consider adding more context and prerequisites

While the binary usage instructions are clear, consider adding:

  • Prerequisites (required Go version)
  • Explanation for the port choice (7980)
  • Available configuration options beyond -listen-all
Makefile (1)

17-21: LGTM! Consider versioning the Docker image tag.

The new target follows the Makefile's conventions and is well-integrated. However, consider adding a version to the Docker image tag for better image management.

 docker-build:
 	@echo "--> Building local-da docker image"
-	@docker build -t local-da .
+	@docker build -t local-da:latest -t local-da:$$(git describe --tags --always) .
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1347dcc and a441cfe.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

21-22: LGTM! Good separation of ENTRYPOINT and CMD

The separation of ENTRYPOINT and CMD is a good practice. It allows:

  • The main executable to be fixed via ENTRYPOINT
  • Default arguments in CMD that can be overridden at runtime

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya enabled auto-merge November 14, 2024 02:51
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 14, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 61370dc Nov 14, 2024
22 checks passed
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya deleted the docker-cleanup branch November 14, 2024 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants