Update joint_names_irb5400.yaml

[aaryanmurgunde]

The URDF Provided has the these names set, and the name of the controller should match it, if not it gives an error saying "Joint_1 received but not found in the model".

[gavanderhoorn]

Thanks for the PR.

I'd rather do things the other way around: the xacro:macro should be updated to use the correct joint names.

Could you update your PR to:

• revert your changes to the .yaml, and
• update the xacro:macro to use joint_N names everywhere?

thanks

[aaryanmurgunde]

@gavanderhoorn Sure! here are the changes that you requested.

Any perticular reason why you want joint_N or just to maintain a standard ?

[gavanderhoorn]

Any perticular reason why you want joint_N or just to maintain a standard ?

joint_N is the standard naming scheme for joints. Compare irb6600_225_255_macro.xacro, irb4400l_30_243_macro.xacro and irb2400_12_155_macro.xacro.

[aaryanmurgunde]

joint_N is the standard naming scheme for joints. Compare irb6600_225_255_macro.xacro, irb4400l_30_243_macro.xacro and irb2400_12_155_macro.xacro.

@gavanderhoorn Already updated here in the last commit.

[aaryanmurgunde]

Hi, @gavanderhoorn do you have an update on this ?