Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add opencv4 into the dependency list for ROS2 #324

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2020

Conversation

LewisLiuPub
Copy link
Contributor

@gaoethan @ahcorde
I updated code to support OpenCV4 for branch ros2, please have a review.

Signed-off-by: Lewis Liu [email protected]

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ else()
endif()

find_package(sensor_msgs REQUIRED)
find_package(OpenCV 3 REQUIRED
find_package(OpenCV 4 REQUIRED
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line force to OpenCV4 , there is no option for version 3.

You should do something like:

find_package(OpenCV 4 QUIET opencv_core opencv_core)
if(NOT OpenCV_FOUND)
  find_package(OpenCV 3 REQUIRED opencv_core opencv_core)
endif()

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It really works, I checked it and uploaded one new patch.
@ahcorde

Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please review the comment regarding OpenCV

Copy link

@chapulina chapulina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW this works for me with OpenCV 4 on Focal.

@ruffsl
Copy link

ruffsl commented Apr 29, 2020

@mjcarroll @ahcorde did you get a chance to look at this?
I see in #272 you've been discussing about this for foxy release.

@mjcarroll mjcarroll merged commit eae9586 into ros-perception:ros2 Apr 30, 2020
@ijnek ijnek mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants