Tests for repoquery -f, -l

[jan-kolarik]

Related: rpm-software-management/dnf#2083.

[jan-kolarik]

After creating the tests for dnf4 branch, I realized these are already present in the dnf5, so no need to backport it there.

[m-blaha]

Just thinking whether it would have some maintenance benefit to keep repoquery/files.feature the same (or as similar as possible) for dnf-4-stack and main branches. What do you think?

[jan-kolarik]

Just thinking whether it would have some maintenance benefit to keep repoquery/files.feature the same (or as similar as possible) for dnf-4-stack and main branches. What do you think?

You're right, I'll try to reuse the tests from dnf5, drop the unusable ones and add the missing test for -l in dnf5.

[m-blaha]

The -l is not completely missing - it just uses long variant of the option --files.

[jan-kolarik]

I've backported the tests from the dnf5 branch and did small adjustments.

[jan-kolarik]

Hmm, it seems the CI tests are failing because F39 environment is used for testing, though the filelists changes were introduced in >= F40. These three failing tests are passing for me locally.

[jan-kolarik]

I think we should better migrate also the dnf4 branch of CI stack to use TMT testing, so we get the different chroots testing "for free".

[jan-kolarik]

Hmm, so I forgot to actually add the testing repository that is used in the tests. Anyway, it's interesting no error about that non-existing repo was thrown.

[m-blaha]

Thanks!