Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add libdnf5 and libdnf5-cli rpminspect ABI check plan #1595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

kontura
Copy link
Contributor

@kontura kontura commented Nov 19, 2024

It compares ABI of current PR build with the last nightly rawhide build. This means the ABI diff will mostly show only very recent changes.

Since it already uses rpminspect we could also enable additional checks if we wanted to.

The plan will be invoked from dnf5 upstream PRs.

kontura added a commit to kontura/dnf5 that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
The plan: rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack#1595

Since the plan compares ABI with latests rawhide build target the job only
to rawhide.
@kontura
Copy link
Contributor Author

kontura commented Nov 19, 2024

It compares ABI of current PR build with the last nightly build.
This means the ABI diff will mostly show only very recent changes.

Since it already uses rpminspect we could also enable additional checks
if we want to, currently it uses `-T abidiff` to only work with ABI.

It also sets `-t BAD`, this affects the exit code so that only ABI
breaks cause the action to fail. Reports with `VERIFY` (such as adding
new symbols) doesn't fail it.
@jan-kolarik
Copy link
Member

Thank you! This is much appreciated 🙂

@jan-kolarik jan-kolarik merged commit 1763aa7 into rpm-software-management:main Nov 25, 2024
5 checks passed
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to rpm-software-management/dnf5 that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
The plan: rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack#1595

Since the plan compares ABI with latests rawhide build target the job only
to rawhide.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants