Some minor dyn-related tweaks #133393
Some minor dyn-related tweaks #133393
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
HIR ty lowering was modified cc @fmease changes to the core type system |
| Some(predicate.with_self_ty(tcx, tcx.types.trait_object_dummy_self)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this relies on auto-traits not having any region bounds 🤔 I don't like the fact that we implicitly rely on that here, given that we may change it in the future, even if I can't think of any auto trait which does so.
Why don't we just pass in all ExistentialPredicates here without any filtering? perf? the elaborator should filter duplicate predicates
|
nit, r=me on the other 2 commits |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
dyn-tweaks
branch
from
565166d
to
bcfc8ab
Compare
|
Ok, I removed the filtering and squashed the two methods together. I also don't expect the filtering to affect perf. |
|
i guess unless this is blocking something @bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
Some minor dyn-related tweaks Each commit should be self-explanatory, but I'm happy to explain what's going on if not. These are tweaks I pulled out of rust-lang#133388, but they can be reviewed sooner than that. r? types
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (dee4e86): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 4.6%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary -2.3%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 796.592s -> 798.676s (0.26%) |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
@bors r=lcnr,spastorino |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (c322cd5): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults (primary 1.4%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 793.948s -> 795.759s (0.23%) |
Each commit should be self-explanatory, but I'm happy to explain what's going on if not. These are tweaks I pulled out of #133388, but they can be reviewed sooner than that.
r? types