Remove double nesting in post-merge workflow #138656
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136177 (clarify BufRead::{fill_buf, consume} docs) - rust-lang#138654 (Remove the regex dependency from coretests) - rust-lang#138655 (rustc-dev-guide sync) - rust-lang#138656 (Remove double nesting in post-merge workflow) - rust-lang#138658 (CI: mirror alpine and centos images to ghcr) - rust-lang#138659 (coverage: Don't store a body span in `FunctionCoverageInfo`) - rust-lang#138661 (Revert: Add *_value methods to proc_macro lib) - rust-lang#138670 (Remove existing AFIDT implementation) - rust-lang#138674 (Various codegen_llvm cleanups) - rust-lang#138684 (use then in docs for `fuse` to enhance readability) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138656 - Kobzol:post-merge-unnest, r=marcoieni Remove double nesting in post-merge workflow See [this](rust-lang#138630 (comment)) :) Can be tested with: ```bash #!/bin/bash PARENT_COMMIT=493c38ba371929579fe136df26eccd9516347c7a SHA=259fdb521200c9abba547302fc2c826479ef26b2 printf "<details>\n<summary>What is this?</summary>\n" >> output.log printf "This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.\n" >> output.log printf "</details>\n\n" >> output.log cargo run --release post-merge-report ${PARENT_COMMIT} ${SHA} >> output.log ``` I think that it's better to leave the notice in CI, to avoid generating it in citool, which can also be executed locally. r? `@marcoieni`
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136177 (clarify BufRead::{fill_buf, consume} docs) - rust-lang#138654 (Remove the regex dependency from coretests) - rust-lang#138655 (rustc-dev-guide sync) - rust-lang#138656 (Remove double nesting in post-merge workflow) - rust-lang#138658 (CI: mirror alpine and centos images to ghcr) - rust-lang#138659 (coverage: Don't store a body span in `FunctionCoverageInfo`) - rust-lang#138661 (Revert: Add *_value methods to proc_macro lib) - rust-lang#138670 (Remove existing AFIDT implementation) - rust-lang#138674 (Various codegen_llvm cleanups) - rust-lang#138684 (use then in docs for `fuse` to enhance readability) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See this :)
Can be tested with:
I think that it's better to leave the notice in CI, to avoid generating it in citool, which can also be executed locally.
r? @marcoieni