Skip to content

Add warning comment to Take::get_ref and Chain::get_ref #139877

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

The methods Take::get_mut and Chain::get_mut include comments
warning about modifying the I/O state of the underlying reader. However,
many readers (e.g. File) allow I/O using a shared reference (e.g.
&File). So, add the same caveat to the get_ref methods.

The methods `Take::get_mut` and `Chain::get_mut` include comments
warning about modifying the I/O state of the underlying reader. However,
many readers (e.g. `File`) allow I/O using a shared reference (e.g.
`&File`). So, add the same caveat to the `get_ref` methods.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 15, 2025

r? @workingjubilee

rustbot has assigned @workingjubilee.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 15, 2025
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Apr 15, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 15, 2025

📌 Commit 043c5ff has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 15, 2025
@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned workingjubilee Apr 15, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138455 (`librustdoc`: more `impl fmt::Display`)
 - rust-lang#139818 (Normalize ADT field in `find_tails_for_unsizing`)
 - rust-lang#139819 (Use `rust-cache` to speed-up `citool` compilation)
 - rust-lang#139824 (Remove safe remove)
 - rust-lang#139848 ( Reduce kw::Empty usage, part 5)
 - rust-lang#139859 (CI: rename MacOS runner)
 - rust-lang#139877 (Add warning comment to `Take::get_ref` and `Chain::get_ref`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ebaef46 into rust-lang:master Apr 15, 2025
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139877 - joshtriplett:take-care, r=dtolnay

Add warning comment to `Take::get_ref` and `Chain::get_ref`

The methods `Take::get_mut` and `Chain::get_mut` include comments
warning about modifying the I/O state of the underlying reader. However,
many readers (e.g. `File`) allow I/O using a shared reference (e.g.
`&File`). So, add the same caveat to the `get_ref` methods.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 15, 2025
@joshtriplett joshtriplett deleted the take-care branch April 20, 2025 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants