Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: adds support for ignores #1

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 12, 2022
Merged

feat: adds support for ignores #1

merged 10 commits into from
Aug 12, 2022

Conversation

djmitche
Copy link

Copy of actions-rs#221 (and GothenburgBitFactory#1!) with one additional commit (dc56dc8).

This isn't strictly necessary -- the action will already follow .cargo/audit.toml -- but as @pinkforest said elsewhere, sometimes being able to control things in an action separately from in-repo files is useful.

Copy link

@pinkforest pinkforest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks a lot :) 💜

@pinkforest pinkforest merged commit bb80078 into rustsec:master Aug 12, 2022
@pinkforest
Copy link

btw - we need to update README for that - wanna send a PR ? cheers

striezel added a commit to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2023
Dates for the releases in the changelog are taken from the non-
squashed commits of <rustsec#1>.
striezel added a commit to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
This should have been done as part of rustsec#1.
pinkforest pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
Dates for the releases in the changelog are taken from the non-
squashed commits of <#1>.
striezel added a commit to striezel-stash/rustsec-audit-check that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
This should have been done as part of rustsec#1.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants