Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance UI with Blue and White Shades for a Modern, Clean Look For Reviews page !!! #583

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

SrijaVuppala295
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ› οΈ Fixes Issue

Fixes: #568

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’» Description

  • Updated the UI design with a fresh blue and white color scheme to provide a modern and clean aesthetic.
  • Applied a blue-to-white gradient background for the main container, enhancing visual appeal.
  • Styled review, question, and reply cards with rounded corners and soft shadows, creating a more polished and user-friendly interface.
  • Improved form elements (input and textarea fields) with a light blue background on focus to make interactions more intuitive.
  • Refined button styles with hover and active effects for a smooth user experience.
  • Enhanced the layout's overall responsiveness and consistency across elements.

Changes:

  • Gradient Background: Applied a linear gradient from blue to white for the main container's background.
  • Card Styling: Updated cards with white background, blue left borders, and subtle shadows for a modern feel.
  • Button Styling: Enhanced buttons with a deep blue background, hover effects, and smooth transitions.
  • Input and Textarea Focus States: Added a light blue background and blue border color for form inputs and textareas on focus.
  • Overall Color Scheme: A mix of blue, white, and light blue shades for a visually appealing, cohesive design.

πŸ“„ Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update (adds or updates related documentation)

πŸ“· Screenshots/GIFs (if any)

BEFORE:

image

AFTER:

diss.mp4

βœ… Checklist

  • I am a participant of GSSoC-ext.
  • I have followed the contribution guidelines of this project.
  • I have viewed deployment of my code.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have made this change from my own.
  • I have taken help from some online resources.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have added documentation to explain my changes.

🀝 GSSoC Participation

  • This PR is submitted under the GSSoC program.
  • I have taken prior approval for this feature/fix.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 8, 2024

βœ… Deploy Preview for dfs-bfs-graph-traversal ready!

Name Link
πŸ”¨ Latest commit 5cb7773
πŸ” Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/dfs-bfs-graph-traversal/deploys/672e7613c7c2c80008ca7d56
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-583--dfs-bfs-graph-traversal.netlify.app
πŸ“± Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Thank you for submitting your pull request! πŸ™Œ We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊

@sakeel-103 sakeel-103 merged commit 332cf3e into sakeel-103:master Nov 9, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2024

πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰ Thank you for your contribution! Your PR #583 has been merged! πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰

@SrijaVuppala295
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sakeel-103 , please add level 2 !!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhancing the discussion page !!
2 participants