Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/ui to ^2.10.3 #7986

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 9, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/ui (source) ^2.10.1 -> ^2.10.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/ui (@​sanity/ui)

v2.10.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v2.10.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2024 13:03
@renovate renovate bot requested review from bjoerge and removed request for a team December 9, 2024 13:03
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge December 9, 2024 13:03
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 9, 2024 4:03pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 9, 2024 4:03pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 9, 2024 4:03pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 9, 2024 4:03pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 9, 2024 4:03pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 9, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@sanity/[email protected] Transitive: environment +43 23.1 MB armandocerna, ash, atombender, ...62 more

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@sanity/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

No changes to documentation

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-ui-2.x branch 2 times, most recently from d0c87ee to 25ab03f Compare December 9, 2024 13:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 09 Dec 2024 15:39:57 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 21.7 efps (46ms) 22.0 efps (46ms) -1ms (-1.1%)
article (body) 56.5 efps (18ms) 56.8 efps (18ms) -0ms (-0.6%)
article (string inside object) 23.8 efps (42ms) 22.7 efps (44ms) +2ms (+4.8%)
article (string inside array) 20.8 efps (48ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) +2ms (+4.2%)
recipe (name) 46.5 efps (22ms) 47.6 efps (21ms) -1ms (-2.3%)
recipe (description) 58.8 efps (17ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) +1ms (+5.9%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.5 efps (54ms) 19.0 efps (53ms) -2ms (-2.8%)
synthetic (string inside object) 19.2 efps (52ms) 18.9 efps (53ms) +1ms (+1.9%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 46ms 49ms 66ms 184ms 269ms 12.0s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 37ms 191ms 271ms 6.6s
article (string inside object) 42ms 44ms 46ms 222ms 246ms 7.2s
article (string inside array) 48ms 50ms 53ms 94ms 152ms 7.6s
recipe (name) 22ms 24ms 27ms 47ms 0ms 7.6s
recipe (description) 17ms 19ms 23ms 29ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 10ms 11ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 54ms 56ms 58ms 67ms 277ms 12.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 52ms 53ms 57ms 413ms 147ms 8.1s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 46ms 50ms 58ms 191ms 206ms 11.7s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 33ms 222ms 269ms 5.8s
article (string inside object) 44ms 47ms 55ms 85ms 184ms 7.3s
article (string inside array) 50ms 54ms 62ms 288ms 314ms 7.9s
recipe (name) 21ms 22ms 28ms 45ms 0ms 7.5s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 41ms 0ms 4.7s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 11ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 53ms 55ms 62ms 130ms 323ms 13.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 53ms 57ms 67ms 98ms 307ms 7.9s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Dec 9, 2024 3:39 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 28s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 9s 2 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 42s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 40s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 54s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into next with commit 22c9708 Dec 9, 2024
57 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/sanity-ui-2.x branch December 9, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant