Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/presentation to v1.19.14 #8127

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 21, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/presentation (source) 1.19.13 -> 1.19.14 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/presentation)

v1.19.14

Bug Fixes
Dependencies

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot added the 📦 deps label Dec 21, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 21, 2024 18:54
@renovate renovate bot added the 🤖 bot label Dec 21, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team December 21, 2024 18:54
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge December 21, 2024 18:54
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Dec 21, 2024 7:19pm
performance-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Dec 21, 2024 7:19pm
test-next-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Dec 21, 2024 7:19pm
test-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Dec 21, 2024 7:19pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 21, 2024 7:19pm

Copy link

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@sanity/[email protected] Transitive: network +4 3.91 MB sanity-io

View full report↗︎

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into next with commit ac2be36 Dec 21, 2024
30 of 35 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/sanity-presentation-1.x branch December 21, 2024 18:55
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Sat, 21 Dec 2024 19:06:57 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 26.3 efps (38ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (body) 59.9 efps (17ms) 67.6 efps (15ms) -2ms (-11.4%)
article (string inside object) 25.0 efps (40ms) 28.6 efps (35ms) -5ms (-12.5%)
article (string inside array) 23.3 efps (43ms) 25.0 efps (40ms) -3ms (-7.0%)
recipe (name) 55.6 efps (18ms) 58.8 efps (17ms) -1ms (-5.6%)
recipe (description) 62.5 efps (16ms) 66.7 efps (15ms) -1ms (-6.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 19.2 efps (52ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) -2ms (-3.8%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) +0ms (-/-%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 42ms 57ms 416ms 196ms 10.2s
article (body) 17ms 20ms 34ms 150ms 229ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 40ms 43ms 47ms 130ms 308ms 7.1s
article (string inside array) 43ms 47ms 52ms 181ms 276ms 7.3s
recipe (name) 18ms 19ms 21ms 33ms 0ms 7.2s
recipe (description) 16ms 17ms 20ms 26ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 9ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 52ms 55ms 86ms 323ms 586ms 13.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 65ms 309ms 508ms 8.6s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 43ms 67ms 390ms 729ms 10.9s
article (body) 15ms 17ms 21ms 168ms 223ms 5.2s
article (string inside object) 35ms 36ms 45ms 169ms 158ms 6.5s
article (string inside array) 40ms 43ms 46ms 165ms 135ms 6.8s
recipe (name) 17ms 18ms 20ms 28ms 0ms 6.5s
recipe (description) 15ms 17ms 18ms 28ms 0ms 4.2s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 10ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 50ms 52ms 63ms 306ms 497ms 12.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 54ms 63ms 109ms 444ms 8.2s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Dec 21, 2024 7:07 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 3s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 37s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 50s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 25s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 26s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 17s 17 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 42s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – test-studio December 21, 2024 19:09 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – performance-studio December 21, 2024 19:12 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – page-building-studio December 21, 2024 19:13 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – test-next-studio December 21, 2024 19:19 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant